Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Happy eyeballs ipv6 vs Firefox #282

Open
bagder opened this issue Feb 2, 2017 · 6 comments
Open

Happy eyeballs ipv6 vs Firefox #282

bagder opened this issue Feb 2, 2017 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@bagder
Copy link
Member

bagder commented Feb 2, 2017

Using the test URL http://bsd10.fh-muenster.de/cgi-bin/he and running Firefox-NEAT on an dual-stack network (like for example the Mozilla Paris wifi), NEAT always[*] picks the IPv4 connection.

If I run a "normal" Firefox on the same network, it always[*] picks an IPv6 connection!

[*] = I've reloaded the page many times in both setups and it seems to pick the same one in a reproducible manner

@perhurt
Copy link
Contributor

perhurt commented Apr 25, 2017

Is this an issue related to the implementation or just a policy issue? Does Firefox favour IPv6 over IPv4?

@bozakov
Copy link
Member

bozakov commented Dec 13, 2017

For this scenario, is the Policy Manager running at all?

@bagder
Copy link
Member Author

bagder commented Dec 13, 2017

I used no policy manager when I spotted this behavior.

@karlgrin
Copy link
Contributor

karlgrin commented Jan 4, 2018

@naeemk should this be considered a bug that needs to be analyzed?

@naeemk
Copy link
Contributor

naeemk commented Jan 8, 2018

@karlgrin: yes, I have put in to the hackaton agenda.

@perhurt
Copy link
Contributor

perhurt commented Jan 9, 2018

When trying to recreate this, Firefox crashed right after startup. I can see in the debug information printed by NEAT that it opens a number of connections towards several mozilla sites, but crashes before I can interact with the browser.

This type of crash happens both with and without the policy manager enabled.

When building "NEATFox" I followed the instructions in NEAT.md (in bagder/gecko-dev NEAT2-branch) and used the master branch of NEAT. Is the procedure for building NEATFox still the same @bagder ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants