Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Split Tab] How should the split tab proposal be extended if browsers start supported more than 2 split tabs? #672

Open
sanketj opened this issue Aug 22, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@sanketj
Copy link
Member

sanketj commented Aug 22, 2023

From @tomayac:

Was it considered that in the future there could be more than two split tabs in a browser tab? At the moment, the baseline assumption seems to be that there are at most two. I can well imagine that browsers would innovate more, and, for example, on wide screens allow a tab to be split in n split tabs.

@sanketj
Copy link
Member Author

sanketj commented Aug 22, 2023

cc: @xuzhengyi1995

@hvanops
Copy link

hvanops commented Sep 8, 2023

I would agree that there are likely use cases where greater than 2 split tabs make sense. E.g., product comparison where a site opens product A, B, C side by side. Likely though, there is a limit to how many tabs can be useful to see at once, where any more than that limit is too much info for the user to digest and actually makes the experience worse rather than better.

To note also: the product comparison layout is possible today, but I imagine it's a pretty large lift for site authors to create. Being able to open into split tab might be easier

@survivor303
Copy link

i like idea to split one to horizontal too, so you can really do multitasking, it is like muxing on linux then :)

@vanowm
Copy link

vanowm commented Mar 10, 2024

If split tab was two unique tabs with a splitId property and only displayed differently, there wouldn't need much changes in already existing API..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants