Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Running 12 instances of the app. Is this ok? #92

Open
fengshui8 opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 11 comments
Open

Running 12 instances of the app. Is this ok? #92

fengshui8 opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 11 comments

Comments

@fengshui8
Copy link

is this ok

is this ok? im running 12 instances of the app for over an hour now, seemingly without issue.

*except for the fact that my CPU is max'd out at 100%...

...No issue with RAM (as i do have 64gb of good ram)... But I'm wondering how efficient this really is-- with the CPU max'd out and all.

Anyone have two cents on the matter?

@fengshui8
Copy link
Author

Currently running 12 instances of the app,
each instance is searching for a separate 1.9 million btc addresses (that begin with “1…”). So actively searching across ~22.8 million btc addresses (that begin with “1…”).

This doesn’t affect my RAM (I’ve got 64GB of good ram,) but my CPU is throttling at 100%.
Is this okay?
Do you think the instances of the app are likely underperforming?—If so, how significantly?

Regardless, do you think it is still worth doing?
Won’t this up the likelihood of a hit significantly in the coming weeks/months?
& What do you think the likelihood of a hit is?

@MrJorman
Copy link

0% chance.

@MrJorman
Copy link

This application is not working correctly. Even if you find the right address, you will not receive a private key, since it is not clear how it works in applications. When you run test.js, it will not give you anything. Just for fun, I used any values from a random address and threw them into test.json and tried to convert them into a private key - nothing worked. So if you find the address, you will not receive the private key.
image

@MrJorman
Copy link

image

The address that is already in test.txt - it is a template from the coinkey module - thus it is most likely included in the database. You are looking for addresses through this application in vain. You will not be able to obtain the private key. And even if you can, then logically coinkey processes your addresses through its database - that is, another person will receive your found address faster than you. (the one who created coinkey)

@MrJorman
Copy link

I looked at the code of the application and all the scripts, and still did not understand why it processes this particular address in test.txt, but cannot process others at all. Just for fun, I went to the Bitcoin address generator, where all the data is listed, and just for fun, I took the already known data and substituted it into test.txt and still didn’t get anything.

@fengshui8
Copy link
Author

@MrJorman bur coinkey doesn’t even require the internet to work …

I don’t think you’re right. I think it might actually work. It’s just about the amount of weeks/months/years that you’re willing to dedicate.

And still you might not find an address.

@fengshui8
Copy link
Author

@Michal2SAB , @MrJorman seems to think that it’s impossible for this app to work. Although it’s statistically improbable, it does work— technically; correct?

@marssystems
Copy link

Yes - the code is technically correct and works as it should. Whether it will find a privkey for 1 of the addresses in your file is another matter.

@MrJorman
Copy link

@Michal2SAB , @MrJorman seems to think that it’s impossible for this app to work. Although it’s statistically improbable, it does work— technically; correct?

It doesn't work well. It also does not know what keys it is looking for, compressed or uncompressed.

@fengshui8
Copy link
Author

@marssystems

yeah I hear you.

the odds of it finding one of the 22,900,000 private keys in my .txt files
is like 1 in trillions upon trillions, multiplied by billions,

…right?

@marssystems
Copy link

Correct !!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants