Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

real difference between archfi and vanilla installation #144

Open
AWHubGit opened this issue Oct 3, 2020 · 11 comments
Open

real difference between archfi and vanilla installation #144

AWHubGit opened this issue Oct 3, 2020 · 11 comments
Labels

Comments

@AWHubGit
Copy link

AWHubGit commented Oct 3, 2020

In Arch Linux social archfi (installations with archfi) is forbidden and banned.

What is the difference between an installation with archfi and as per installation guide?
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Installation_guide

archfi prepares command lines and knows all the choices and options. What else?

Did you compare vanilla and archfi installation (images) side-by-side once? Difference in directory tree and in files?

@ulgens
Copy link

ulgens commented Oct 3, 2020

In Arch Linux social archfi (installations with archfi) is forbidden and banned.

Can you please give source for this?

@AWHubGit
Copy link
Author

AWHubGit commented Oct 4, 2020

https://bbs.archlinux.de/viewtopic.php?id=32931
https://bbs.archlinux.de/viewtopic.php?pid=377851#p377851
https://bbs.archlinux.org/misc.php?action=rules

"Eine Arch Linux Installation impliziert, dass du der Installationsanleitung des offiziellen Wikis gefolgt bist."

Only true and genuine installations of Arch Linux by hand (no scripts) allowed/accepted.

So what is the real difference archfi versus vanilla?

I think at Arch Linux they are too lazy to write good install scripts.

@LatticeLadder
Copy link

The first principle of Arch is simplicity: without unnecessary additions or modifications. Wiki
so it is expected to avoid such a burdensome install method, even it's user-friendly, I think.

@TheRingMaster
Copy link

So you would think someone that creates a script "by hand" to make it somewhat simpler for new user to use the system would be beneficial. It's intimidating to a new user. Let them use scripts learn from their mistakes correct them and then possibly they can do by hand

@TheRingMaster
Copy link

Linux is about learning and contribution not "lets make this install hard so users mess up their install and revert to an ubuntu install" It's arch's way so i don't complain but guys like this that take the time to create scripts deserve a lil love

@Smeeto13
Copy link

The end result is exactly the same as if you ran the same commands manually

@premkumarmahenderker
Copy link

I've recently used this script & I'm pretty much stunned how great the script works. Basically I used this to configure partitioning, base install, fstab, user config, xorg, time & location, dhcpcd & grub. (which freed most of my code remembering)
Beside this, I can totally dive into desktop environment & application installations & much more stuff that I don't need. Kudos to matmoul.

@MatMoul
Copy link
Owner

MatMoul commented Dec 6, 2020

archfi is probably the closest installer to the installation presented in the wiki.
But Arch Linux is intended to be a distribution that requires knowing all the ins and outs of each packages.
You can use archfi to get an overview and train yourself on the installation of this distribution, create VMs for your developments or your different tests.
But you will always have to know what you are doing.

@AWHubGit
Copy link
Author

AWHubGit commented Apr 2, 2021

But now they have their own guided and automated "official" installer:
https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/archinstall/
Why hasn't archfi been choosen to be the official installer?

@krisfail
Copy link

krisfail commented Apr 5, 2021

I'm just guessing, but I think it's because the official installer is a CUI interactive format and looks simpler.
Well, as far as functionality goes, that thing is terrible...

@premkumarmahenderker
Copy link

But now they have their own guided and automated "official" installer:
https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/archinstall/
Why hasn't archfi been choosen to be the official installer?

I donno about this. How does this "archinstall" works anyways? Caz there's no guides & tutorials for that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants