You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, you can't use wildcard characters in the search bar which can make searching for groups of similar items difficult.
For example, there's currently no way to search for only the first two entries in this list of vms without all four of these vms appearing in the search results.
Adding the wildcard characters would let you search for any single character (b?rd would return bird, bard, etc.), any number of characters (charact* would return character, characterization, characters, etc.), or ~ which lets you include the other wildcard characters in your search (Hello~? would return Hello?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
DavidResende0
changed the title
Add the Ability to use Wildcard Characters when using the Search Function in the UI
[RFE] Add the Ability to use Wildcard Characters when using the Search Function in the UI
Jan 26, 2024
? And * are good and are fairly standard. Where does the ~ syntax come from?
I was reading a bit about them and saw that ~ is sometimes used to show that you're trying to specifically search for the ? or * character as opposed to using them as a wildcard character.
Currently, you can't use wildcard characters in the search bar which can make searching for groups of similar items difficult.
For example, there's currently no way to search for only the first two entries in this list of vms without all four of these vms appearing in the search results.
Adding the wildcard characters would let you search for any single character (
b?rd
would returnbird
,bard
, etc.), any number of characters (charact*
would returncharacter
,characterization
,characters
, etc.), or ~ which lets you include the other wildcard characters in your search (Hello~?
would returnHello?
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: