Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Seeking Advice on Achieving Symmetrical TOIs Using TractSeg #266

Open
melthy002 opened this issue Feb 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Seeking Advice on Achieving Symmetrical TOIs Using TractSeg #266

melthy002 opened this issue Feb 16, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@melthy002
Copy link

melthy002 commented Feb 16, 2024

Hello TractSeg Community,
I am currently engaged in a project where my objective is to obtain pairs of symmetrical Tracts of Interest (TOIs) for further analysis. To achieve this, I have created a symmetrical group-specific FOD template, which I then used as an input for TractSeg in the hope of obtaining symmetrical output for TOIs, such as the left and right Arcuate Fasciculus (AF).
However, I am unsure if the output TOIs I obtained are truly symmetrical as intended. I would appreciate it if anyone could shed light on whether TractSeg inherently produces symmetrical TOIs when provided with a symmetrical FOD template, or if there are additional steps or considerations I need to take into account to ensure the symmetry of the output TOIs.
Furthermore, if the output TOIs are not naturally symmetrical, could anyone provide advice or methodologies that could be employed to achieve symmetrical TOIs? Any insights into best practices or adjustments to my current approach would be highly valuable.
Thank you for your time and assistance. I look forward to any suggestions or guidance you can provide.

Best wishes,
Kitty

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant