Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minimum image regression relies on distinction between "accepted" and "ignored" components #1085

Open
tsalo opened this issue Apr 21, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #1086
Open

Minimum image regression relies on distinction between "accepted" and "ignored" components #1085

tsalo opened this issue Apr 21, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #1086
Labels
bug issues describing a bug or error found in the project discussion issues that still need to be discussed

Comments

@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Apr 21, 2024

Summary

I'm working on refactoring the global signal regression functions in order to better understand them (particularly for #1071), and I noticed that gscontrol.minimum_image_regression specifically uses "accepted" components and not "ignored" components. Since we eliminated the "ignored" classification in #756, MIR likely doesn't work the way it was intended anymore.

We could probably leverage the classification tags, but those vary by decision tree and are essentially up to the user.

@tsalo tsalo added bug issues describing a bug or error found in the project discussion issues that still need to be discussed labels Apr 21, 2024
@tsalo tsalo linked a pull request Apr 21, 2024 that will close this issue
@tsalo
Copy link
Member Author

tsalo commented Apr 29, 2024

Ah, I see that "low variance" and "accept borderline" only exist as classification tags in the meica and tedana_orig trees.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug issues describing a bug or error found in the project discussion issues that still need to be discussed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant