Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Final decision: Fix Fig 2 & 3 #7

Open
LunaSare opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Final decision: Fix Fig 2 & 3 #7

LunaSare opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@LunaSare
Copy link
Owner

AE: "In Fig. 2 and 3 It looks like the Paleogene starts 45 Ma. I would use equally spaced numbers e.g. 0, 10, 20, … instead of showing boundary ages (as 45 is not one)."

https://github.com/LunaSare/datelifeMS1/blob/main/submission/Figure_2.pdf
https://github.com/LunaSare/datelifeMS1/blob/main/submission/Figure_3.pdf

I think we can use inkscape magic to address this fix, too.
It might be good to create a graph that uses 0,10,20... so that we know where the numbers should go on the axis and then use the same axis for all.

@snacktavish
Copy link
Collaborator

I took a crack at it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants