You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In order to perform replicate simulations of dual phase microstructure experimental loading, the ability to use predefined damask input files in a matflow-damask workflow requires implementation
Note:
Newest damask version will use .vtr file format for geometry files.
Write a volume_element dict that can be passed to a simulate_volume_element_loading task. (already functionality to do these individually in damask-parse)
Output
volume_element dict
Implementation
function mapper as part of the generate_volume_element task.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks Guy. Might as well throw the option to use an existing load case file in there as well!
EDIT: actually never mind about the load case file for now, that is easy enough to include directly in the simulate_volume_element_loading task.
No I do think it would be better to keep separate as a task so as to keep the workflow as modular as possible? Unless you mean defining a filepath to the .load file in the simulate_volume_element_loading task?
If you want to add a generate_load_case task with method from_DAMASK_load_file, that would be nice, but it's not vital at the moment. We would need to add a new function damask_parse.readers.read_load to parse DAMASK's new YAML load file format.
In order to perform replicate simulations of dual phase microstructure experimental loading, the ability to use predefined damask input files in a matflow-damask workflow requires implementation
Note:
Task name: generate_volume_element ( already used here; task_schema l:335 and here; func mappers l:43 )
Method name: from_damask_input_files
Implementation name: damask
Inputs
Function steps
Output
Implementation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: