A High-level Scorecard Modeling API | 评分卡建模尽在于此
Scorecard-Bundle is a high-level Scorecard modeling API that is easy-to-use and Scikit-Learn consistent. The transformer and model classes in Scorecard-Bundle comply with Scikit-Learn‘s fit-transform-predict convention.
-
Pip: Scorecard-Bundle can be installed with pip:
pip install --upgrade scorecardbundle
-
Manually: Download codes from github
<https://github.com/Lantianzz/Scorecard-Bundle>
and import them directly:import sys sys.path.append('E:\Github\Scorecard-Bundle') # add path that contains the codes from scorecardbundle.feature_discretization import ChiMerge as cm from scorecardbundle.feature_discretization import FeatureIntervalAdjustment as fia from scorecardbundle.feature_encoding import WOE as woe from scorecardbundle.feature_selection import FeatureSelection as fs from scorecardbundle.model_training import LogisticRegressionScoreCard as lrsc from scorecardbundle.model_evaluation import ModelEvaluation as me
- Like Scikit-Learn, Scorecard-Bundle basiclly have two types of obejects, transforms and predictors. They comply with the fit-transform and fit-predict convention;
- A complete example showing how to build a scorecard with high explainability and good predictability with Scorecard-Bundle can be found in https://github.com/Lantianzz/Scorecard-Bundle/blob/master/examples/%5BExample%5D%20Build%20a%20scorecard%20with%20high%20explainability%20and%20good%20predictability%20with%20Scorecard-Bundle.ipynb
- See more details in API Guide;
(See the complete example in [Example] Build a scorecard with high explainability and good predictability with Scorecard-Bundle ):
-
Load Scorecard-Bundle
from scorecardbundle.feature_discretization import ChiMerge as cm from scorecardbundle.feature_discretization import FeatureIntervalAdjustment as fia from scorecardbundle.feature_encoding import WOE as woe from scorecardbundle.feature_selection import FeatureSelection as fs from scorecardbundle.model_training import LogisticRegressionScoreCard as lrsc from scorecardbundle.model_evaluation import ModelEvaluation as me
-
Feature Discretization with ChiMerge
Note that the feature intervals here are open to the left and close to the right.
trans_cm = cm.ChiMerge(max_intervals=10, min_intervals=5, output_dataframe=True) result_cm = trans_cm.fit_transform(X, y) trans_cm.boundaries_ # see the interval binnign for each feature
-
Evaluate Predictabilty
trans_woe = woe.WOE_Encoder(output_dataframe=True) result_woe = trans_woe.fit_transform(result_cm, y) print(trans_woe.iv_) # information value (iv) for each feature print(trans_woe.result_dict_) # woe dictionary and iv value for each feature
-
Feature Engineering:Check the sample distribution and event rate distribution for each feature. Adjust the feature intervals to get better interpretability or stability.
-
Check the sample distribution and event rate distribution
col = 'housing_median_age' fia.plot_event_dist(result_cm[col],y,x_rotation=60)
-
Adjust the feature intervals to get better interpretability or stability
new_x = cm.assign_interval_str(X[col].values,[33,45]) # apply new interval boundaries to the feature woe.woe_vector(new_x, y.values) # check the information value of the resulted feature that applied the new intervals
({'-inf~33.0': -0.21406011499136973, '33.0~45.0': 0.08363199161936338, '45.0~inf': 0.7012457415969229}, 0.09816803871772663)
-
Check the distributions again
fia.plot_event_dist(new_x,y,title=f"Event rate distribution of feature '{col}'", x_label=col, y_label='More valuable than Q90', x_rotation=60,save=True)
-
Update the dataset of binned features
result_cm[col] = new_x # great explainability and predictability. Select. feature_list.append(col) print(feature_list)
-
-
After finishing interval adjustments for all features, perform WOE encoding to the adjusted feature data
trans_woe = woe.WOE_Encoder(output_dataframe=True) result_woe = trans_woe.fit_transform(result_cm[feature_list], y) result_woe.head()
latitude median_income total_rooms housing_median_age longitude population 0 -0.126659 -0.295228 0.294410 0.083632 -0.37460 0.044972 1 0.300017 -0.295228 0.294410 -0.214060 -0.37460 -0.262287 2 -0.126659 -1.056799 -0.236322 0.083632 -0.37460 -0.262287 3 -0.447097 -0.295228 0.294410 -0.214060 0.68479 0.044972 4 0.300017 -2.194393 -0.236322 0.083632 -0.37460 -0.262287 trans_woe.iv_ # the information value (iv) for each feature
{'latitude': 0.09330096146239328, 'median_income': 2.5275362958451018, 'total_rooms': 0.12825413939140448, 'housing_median_age': 0.09816803871772663, 'longitude': 0.11101533122863683, 'population': 0.07193530955126093}
-
Feature selection: remove features with insufficient information(IV less than 0.02), or the feature which are highly correlated with other features with stronger iv to avoid colinearity problem. (the correlation here is measured by Pearson Correlation Coefficient with threshold 0.6, which can be adjusted by parameter
threshold_corr
)fs.selection_with_iv_corr(trans_woe, result_woe) # column 'corr_with' lists the other features that are highly correlated with the feature
factor IV woe_dict corr_with 1 median_income 2.527536 {'-inf 2.875': -2.1943934506450016, '2.8753.5...{} 2 total_rooms 0.128254 {'-inf 1176.0': -0.7003111163731507, '1176.02...{'population': -0.708264369318934} 4 longitude 0.111015 {'-118.37 inf': -0.3746002086398019, '-122.41...{} 3 housing_median_age 0.098168 {'-inf 33.0': -0.21406011499136973, '33.045.0...{} 0 latitude 0.093301 {'-inf 34.0': -0.12665884912551398, '34.037.6...{} 5 population 0.071935 {'-inf 873.0': 0.2876654505272535, '1275.0152...{'total_rooms': -0.708264369318934} # "total_rooms" and "population" are high correlated. Drop "population" since it has lower IV. feature_list.remove("population") feature_list
# Perform WOE encoding again trans_woe = woe.WOE_Encoder(output_dataframe=True) result_woe = trans_woe.fit_transform(result_cm[feature_list], y) # WOE is fast. This only takes less then 1 seconds result_woe.head()
# Check correlation heat map corr_matrix = result_woe.corr() plt.figure(figsize=(3,3)) sns.heatmap(corr_matrix, cmap = 'bwr', center=0) plt.xticks(fontsize=12) plt.yticks(fontsize=12) plt.show()
-
Model Training: Train the Scorecard model and get the scoring rules.
Note that the feature intervals (
value
column in the rules table) are all open to the left and close to the right (e.g. 34.0~37.6 means (34.0, 37.6] ).model = lrsc.LogisticRegressionScoreCard(trans_woe, PDO=-20, basePoints=100, verbose=True) model.fit(result_woe, y) model.woe_df_ # the scorecard rules ''' feature: feature name; value: feature intervals that are open to the left and closed to the right; woe: the woe encoding for each feature interval; beta: the regression coefficients for each feature in the Logistic regression; score: the assigned score for each feature interval; '''
feature value woe beta score 0 latitude -inf~34.0 -0.126659 1.443634 15.0 1 latitude 34.0~37.6 0.300017 1.443634 32.0 2 latitude 37.6~inf -0.447097 1.443634 1.0 3 median_income -inf~2.875 -2.194393 1.078135 -48.0 4 median_income 2.875~3.5625 -1.056799 1.078135 -13.0 5 median_income 3.5625~3.9625 -0.681424 1.078135 -1.0 6 median_income 3.9625~5.102880000000001 -0.295228 1.078135 11.0 7 median_income 5.102880000000001~5.765463 0.388220 1.078135 32.0 8 median_income 5.765463~6.340365 0.909407 1.078135 48.0 9 median_income 6.340365~6.953202 1.355401 1.078135 62.0 10 median_income 6.953202~7.737496000000001 1.895717 1.078135 79.0 11 median_income 7.737496000000001~8.925106 3.130872 1.078135 117.0 12 median_income 8.925106~inf 4.940572 1.078135 173.0 13 total_rooms -inf~1176.0 -0.700311 0.792079 4.0 14 total_rooms 1176.0~2012.0 -0.236322 0.792079 14.0 15 total_rooms 2012.0~2499.0 -0.022575 0.792079 19.0 16 total_rooms 2499.0~4178.0 0.294410 0.792079 27.0 17 total_rooms 4178.0~inf 0.430445 0.792079 30.0 18 housing_median_age -inf~33.0 -0.214060 2.105821 7.0 19 housing_median_age 33.0~45.0 0.083632 2.105821 25.0 20 housing_median_age 45.0~inf 0.701246 2.105821 62.0 21 longitude -118.37~inf -0.374600 1.451295 4.0 22 longitude -122.41~-118.37 0.152499 1.451295 26.0 23 longitude -inf~-122.41 0.684790 1.451295 48.0 -
Scorecard Adjustment: Users can manually modify the scorecard rules (with codes as shown bellow, or save the rules table locally, finish modification and load the excel file to kernal),and then use the
load_scorecard
parameter ofpredict()
function to pass the scorecard rules to model.See details in the API doc ofload_scorecard
parameter.sc_table = model.woe_df_.copy() sc_table['score'][(sc_table.feature=='housing_median_age') & (sc_table.value=='45.0~inf')] = 61 sc_table
-
Apply the Scorecard to predict scores. Scorecard should be applied on the original feature values.
result = model.predict(X[feature_list], load_scorecard=sc_table) # Scorecard should be applied on the original feature values result_val = model.predict(X_val[feature_list], load_scorecard=sc_table) # Scorecard should be applied on the original feature values result.head() # if model object's verbose parameter is set to False, predict will only return Total scores
latitude median_income total_rooms housing_median_age longitude TotalScore 0 15.0 11.0 27.0 25.0 4.0 82.0 1 32.0 11.0 27.0 7.0 4.0 81.0 2 15.0 -13.0 14.0 25.0 4.0 45.0 3 1.0 11.0 27.0 7.0 48.0 94.0 4 32.0 -48.0 14.0 25.0 4.0 27.0 Loading a scorecard rules file from local position to a new kernal:
# OR if we load rules from local position. sc_table = pd.read_excel('rules') model = lrsc.LogisticRegressionScoreCard(woe_transformer=None, verbose=True) # Pass None to woe_transformer because the predict function does not need it result = model.predict(X[feature_list], load_scorecard=sc_table) # Scorecard should be applied on the original feature values result_val = model.predict(X_val[feature_list], load_scorecard=sc_table) # Scorecard should be applied on the original feature values result.head() # if model object's verbose parameter is set to False, predict will only return Total scores
-
Model Evaluation(suitable for any binary classification proble)
# Train evaluation = me.BinaryTargets(y, result['TotalScore']) evaluation.plot_all() # Validation evaluation = me.BinaryTargets(y_val, result_val['TotalScore']) evaluation.plot_all()
- [Future Fix] In several functions of WOE and ChiMerge module, vector outer product is used to get the boolean mask matrix between two vectors. This may cause memory error if the feature has too many unique values (e.g. a feature whose sample size is 350,000 and number of unique values is 10,000 caused this error in a 8G RAM laptop when calculating WOE). The tricky thing is the error message may not be "memory error" and this makes it harder for user to debug ( the current error message could be
TypeError: 'bool' object is not iterable
orDeprecationWarning: elementwise comparison failed
). The next release will add proper error message for this rare error. - [Fix] When using V1.0.2, songshijun007 brought up an issue about the raise of KeyError due to too few unique values on training set and more extreme values in the test set. This issue has been resolved and added to V1.1.0. (issue url: #1 (comment)).
- [Fix] Fixed a few minor bugs and warnings detected by Spyder's Static Code Analysis.
- [Fix] Fixed a bug in
scorecardbundle.feature_discretization.ChiMerge.ChiMerge
to ensure the output discretized feature values are continous intervals from negative infinity to infinity, covering all possible values. This was done by modifying_assign_interval_base
function andchi_merge_vector
function; - [Fix] Changed the default value of
min_intervals
parameter inscorecardbundle.feature_discretization.ChiMerge.ChiMerge
from None to 1 so that in case of encountering features with only one unique value would not cause an error. Setting the default value to 1 is actually more consistent to the actual meaning, as there is at least one interval in a feature; - [Add] Add
scorecardbundle.feature_discretization.FeatureIntervalAdjustment
class to cover the functionality related to manually adjusting features in feature engineering stage. Now this class only containsplot_event_dist
function, which can visualize a feature's sample distribution and event rate distribution. This is to facilate feature adjustment decisions in order to obtain better explainability and predictabiltiy;
- Fixed a bug in scorecardbundle.feature_discretization.ChiMerge.ChiMerge.transform(). In V1.0.1, The transform function did not run normally when the number of unique values in a feature is less then the parameter 'min_intervals'. This was due to an ill-considered if-else statement. This bug has been fixed in v1.0.2;
Scorecard-Bundle是一个基于Python的高级评分卡建模API,实施方便且符合Scikit-Learn的调用习惯,包含的类均遵守Scikit-Learn的fit-transform-predict习惯。
-
Pip: Scorecard-Bundle可使用pip安装:
pip install --upgrade scorecardbundle
-
手动: 从Github下载代码
<https://github.com/Lantianzz/Scorecard-Bundle>
, 直接导入:import sys sys.path.append('E:\Github\Scorecard-Bundle') # add path that contains the codes from scorecardbundle.feature_discretization import ChiMerge as cm from scorecardbundle.feature_discretization import FeatureIntervalAdjustment as fia from scorecardbundle.feature_encoding import WOE as woe from scorecardbundle.feature_selection import FeatureSelection as fs from scorecardbundle.model_training import LogisticRegressionScoreCard as lrsc from scorecardbundle.model_evaluation import ModelEvaluation as me
- 与Scikit-Learn相似,Scorecard-Bundle有两种class,transformer和predictor,分别遵守fit-transform和fit-predict习惯;
- 完整示例展示如何训练可解释性和预测力俱佳的评分卡 https://github.com/Lantianzz/Scorecard-Bundle/blob/master/examples/%5BExample%5D%20Build%20a%20scorecard%20with%20high%20explainability%20and%20good%20predictability%20with%20Scorecard-Bundle.ipynb
- 详细用法参见API Guide;
(完整使用示例参见示例 - 训练预测力与可解释性俱佳的评分卡模型 ):
-
模块导入
from scorecardbundle.feature_discretization import ChiMerge as cm from scorecardbundle.feature_discretization import FeatureIntervalAdjustment as fia from scorecardbundle.feature_encoding import WOE as woe from scorecardbundle.feature_selection import FeatureSelection as fs from scorecardbundle.model_training import LogisticRegressionScoreCard as lrsc from scorecardbundle.model_evaluation import ModelEvaluation as me
-
特征离散化(基于ChiMerge)
这里的特征区间均为左开右闭区间。
trans_cm = cm.ChiMerge(max_intervals=10, min_intervals=5, output_dataframe=True) result_cm = trans_cm.fit_transform(X, y) trans_cm.boundaries_ # 每个特征的区间切分
-
特征编码(基于证据权重WOE)和预测力评估
trans_woe = woe.WOE_Encoder(output_dataframe=True) result_woe = trans_woe.fit_transform(result_cm, y) print(trans_woe.iv_) # 每个特征的信息值 (iv) print(trans_woe.result_dict_) # 每个特征的WOE字典和信息值 (iv)
-
特征工程示例:查看单个特征的取值分布和响应率分布,结合分布在相应领域的可解释性,调整特征的取值分组
-
查看分布和响应率
col = 'housing_median_age' fia.plot_event_dist(result_cm[col],y,x_rotation=60)
-
修改特征分组
new_x = cm.assign_interval_str(X[col].values,[33,45]) # apply new interval boundaries to the feature woe.woe_vector(new_x, y.values) # check the information value of the resulted feature that applied the new intervals
({'-inf~33.0': -0.21406011499136973, '33.0~45.0': 0.08363199161936338, '45.0~inf': 0.7012457415969229}, 0.09816803871772663)
-
再次查看分布图
fia.plot_event_dist(new_x,y,title=f"Event rate distribution of feature '{col}'", x_label=col, y_label='More valuable than Q90', x_rotation=60,save=True)
-
更新分组特征数据
result_cm[col] = new_x # great explainability and predictability. Select. feature_list.append(col) print(feature_list)
-
-
完成全部特征的分组检查后,再次将分组特征进行WOE编码
trans_woe = woe.WOE_Encoder(output_dataframe=True) result_woe = trans_woe.fit_transform(result_cm[feature_list], y) result_woe.head()
latitude median_income total_rooms housing_median_age longitude population 0 -0.126659 -0.295228 0.294410 0.083632 -0.37460 0.044972 1 0.300017 -0.295228 0.294410 -0.214060 -0.37460 -0.262287 2 -0.126659 -1.056799 -0.236322 0.083632 -0.37460 -0.262287 3 -0.447097 -0.295228 0.294410 -0.214060 0.68479 0.044972 4 0.300017 -2.194393 -0.236322 0.083632 -0.37460 -0.262287 trans_woe.iv_ # the information value (iv) for each feature
{'latitude': 0.09330096146239328, 'median_income': 2.5275362958451018, 'total_rooms': 0.12825413939140448, 'housing_median_age': 0.09816803871772663, 'longitude': 0.11101533122863683, 'population': 0.07193530955126093}
-
特征选择: 剔除预测力过低(通常用IV不足0.02筛选)、以及相关性过高引起共线性问题的特征
(相关性过高的阈值默认为皮尔森相关性系数大于0.6,可通过threshold_corr参数调整)
fs.selection_with_iv_corr(trans_woe, result_woe) # corr_with 列示了与该特征相关性过高的特征和相关系数
factor IV woe_dict corr_with 1 median_income 2.527536 {'-inf 2.875': -2.1943934506450016, '2.8753.5...{} 2 total_rooms 0.128254 {'-inf 1176.0': -0.7003111163731507, '1176.02...{'population': -0.708264369318934} 4 longitude 0.111015 {'-118.37 inf': -0.3746002086398019, '-122.41...{} 3 housing_median_age 0.098168 {'-inf 33.0': -0.21406011499136973, '33.045.0...{} 0 latitude 0.093301 {'-inf 34.0': -0.12665884912551398, '34.037.6...{} 5 population 0.071935 {'-inf 873.0': 0.2876654505272535, '1275.0152...{'total_rooms': -0.708264369318934} # "total_rooms" and "population" are high correlated. Drop "population" since it has lower IV. feature_list.remove("population") feature_list
# Perform WOE encoding again trans_woe = woe.WOE_Encoder(output_dataframe=True) result_woe = trans_woe.fit_transform(result_cm[feature_list], y) # WOE is fast. This only takes less then 1 seconds result_woe.head()
# Check correlation heat map corr_matrix = result_woe.corr() plt.figure(figsize=(3,3)) sns.heatmap(corr_matrix, cmap = 'bwr', center=0) plt.xticks(fontsize=12) plt.yticks(fontsize=12) plt.show()
-
模型训练
这里的特征区间(评分规则表的value列)均为左开右闭区间(e.g. 34.0~37.6 代表 (34, 37.6] )
model = lrsc.LogisticRegressionScoreCard(trans_woe, PDO=-20, basePoints=100, verbose=True) model.fit(result_woe, y) model.woe_df_ # 从woe_df_属性中可得评分卡规则 ''' feature: feature name; value: feature intervals that are open to the left and closed to the right; woe: the woe encoding for each feature interval; beta: the regression coefficients for each feature in the Logistic regression; score: the assigned score for each feature interval; '''
feature value woe beta score 0 latitude -inf~34.0 -0.126659 1.443634 15.0 1 latitude 34.0~37.6 0.300017 1.443634 32.0 2 latitude 37.6~inf -0.447097 1.443634 1.0 3 median_income -inf~2.875 -2.194393 1.078135 -48.0 4 median_income 2.875~3.5625 -1.056799 1.078135 -13.0 5 median_income 3.5625~3.9625 -0.681424 1.078135 -1.0 6 median_income 3.9625~5.102880000000001 -0.295228 1.078135 11.0 7 median_income 5.102880000000001~5.765463 0.388220 1.078135 32.0 8 median_income 5.765463~6.340365 0.909407 1.078135 48.0 9 median_income 6.340365~6.953202 1.355401 1.078135 62.0 10 median_income 6.953202~7.737496000000001 1.895717 1.078135 79.0 11 median_income 7.737496000000001~8.925106 3.130872 1.078135 117.0 12 median_income 8.925106~inf 4.940572 1.078135 173.0 13 total_rooms -inf~1176.0 -0.700311 0.792079 4.0 14 total_rooms 1176.0~2012.0 -0.236322 0.792079 14.0 15 total_rooms 2012.0~2499.0 -0.022575 0.792079 19.0 16 total_rooms 2499.0~4178.0 0.294410 0.792079 27.0 17 total_rooms 4178.0~inf 0.430445 0.792079 30.0 18 housing_median_age -inf~33.0 -0.214060 2.105821 7.0 19 housing_median_age 33.0~45.0 0.083632 2.105821 25.0 20 housing_median_age 45.0~inf 0.701246 2.105821 62.0 21 longitude -118.37~inf -0.374600 1.451295 4.0 22 longitude -122.41~-118.37 0.152499 1.451295 26.0 23 longitude -inf~-122.41 0.684790 1.451295 48.0 -
评分卡调整: 用户可手动调整规则(如下面方法的手动调整、或导出到本地修改好再上传excel文件),并使用predict()的load_scorecard参数传入模型,详见load_scorecard参数的文档。
sc_table = model.woe_df_.copy() sc_table['score'][(sc_table.feature=='housing_median_age') & (sc_table.value=='45.0~inf')] = 61 sc_table
-
应用评分卡模型
result = model.predict(X[feature_list], load_scorecard=sc_table) # Scorecard should be applied on the original feature values result_val = model.predict(X_val[feature_list], load_scorecard=sc_table) # Scorecard should be applied on the original feature values result.head() # if model object's verbose parameter is set to False, predict will only return Total scores
latitude median_income total_rooms housing_median_age longitude TotalScore 0 15.0 11.0 27.0 25.0 4.0 82.0 1 32.0 11.0 27.0 7.0 4.0 81.0 2 15.0 -13.0 14.0 25.0 4.0 45.0 3 1.0 11.0 27.0 7.0 48.0 94.0 4 32.0 -48.0 14.0 25.0 4.0 27.0 如果是在新的kernal里从本地load模型进行预测:
# OR if we load rules from local position. sc_table = pd.read_excel('rules') model = lrsc.LogisticRegressionScoreCard(woe_transformer=None, verbose=True) result = model.predict(X[feature_list], load_scorecard=sc_table) # Scorecard should be applied on the original feature values result_val = model.predict(X_val[feature_list], load_scorecard=sc_table) # Scorecard should be applied on the original feature values result.head() # if model object's verbose parameter is set to False, predict will only return Total scores
-
模型评估(适用于全部二元分类问题)
# Train evaluation = me.BinaryTargets(y, result['TotalScore']) evaluation.plot_all() # Validation evaluation = me.BinaryTargets(y_val, result_val['TotalScore']) evaluation.plot_all()
- [Future Fix] WOE和ChiMerge模块的几处代码(例如WOE模块的woe_vector函数)中,利用向量外积获得两个向量间的boolean mask矩阵,当输入的特征具有较多的唯一值时,可能会导致计算此外积的时候内存溢出(e.g. 样本量35万、唯一值1万个的特征,已在8G内存的电脑上计算WOE会内存溢出),此时的报错信息未必是内存溢出,给用户debug造成困难(当前的报错信息可能是
TypeError: 'bool' object is not iterable
或DeprecationWarning: elementwise comparison failed
),在下一版本中会为此罕见的error增加详细的报错信息提示; - [Fix] 在使用V1.0.2版本时,songshijun007 在issue中提到当测试集存在比训练集更大的特征值时会造成KeyError。这处bug已被解决,已添加到V1.1.0版本中(issue链接#1 (comment)).
- [Fix] 修复Spyder的Static Code Analysis功能检测出的几处小bug和warning.
- [Fix]修正scorecardbundle.feature_discretization.ChiMerge.ChiMerge,使得任意情况下输出的取值区间都是负无穷到正无穷的连续区间(通过修改_assign_interval_base和chi_merge_vector实现);
- [Fix] 将scorecardbundle.feature_discretization.ChiMerge.ChiMerge中的min_intervals默认值由None改为1,更符合实际情况(实际至少能有一个区间),当遇到特征的唯一值仅有一个的极端情况时也能直接输出此类特征的原值;
- [Add] 增加scorecardbundle.feature_discretization.FeatureIntervalAdjustment类,覆盖了特征工程阶段手动调整特征相关的功能,目前实现了
plot_event_dist
函数,可实现样本分布和响应率分布的可视化,方便对特征进行调整,已获得更好的可解释性和预测力;
- [Fix] 修复scorecardbundle.feature_discretization.ChiMerge.ChiMerge.transform()的一处bug。在V1.0.1中,当一个特征唯一值的数量小于'min_intervals'参数时,transform函数无法正常运行,这是一处考虑不周的if-else判断语句造成的. 此bug已经在v1.0.2中修复;
ChiMerge is a discretization algorithm introduced by Randy Kerber in "ChiMerge: Discretization of Numeric Attributes". It can transform a numerical features into categorical feature or reduce the number of intervals in a ordinal feature based on the feature's distribution and the target classes' relative frequencies in each interval. As a result, it keep statistically significantly different intervals and merge similar ones.
m: integer, optional(default=2)
The number of adjacent intervals to compare during chi-squared test.
confidence_level: float, optional(default=0.9)
The confidence level to determine the threshold for intervals to
be considered as different during the chi-square test.
max_intervals: int, optional(default=None)
Specify the maximum number of intervals the discretized array will have.
Sometimes (like when training a scorecard model) fewer intervals are
prefered. If do not need this option just set it to None.
min_intervals: int, optional(default=1)
Specify the mininum number of intervals the discretized array will have.
If do not need this option just set it to 1.
initial_intervals: int, optional(default=100)
The original Chimerge algorithm starts by putting each unique value
in an interval and merging through a loop. This can be time-consumming
when sample size is large.
Set the initial_intervals option to values other than None (like 10 or 100)
will make the algorithm start at the number of intervals specified (the
initial intervals are generated using quantiles). This can greatly shorten
the run time. If do not need this option just set it to None.
delimiter: string, optional(default='~')
The returned array will be an array of intervals that are closed to the right.
Each interval is representated by string (i.e. '1~2', which means (1,2]),
which takes the form lower+delimiter+upper. This parameter control the symbol that
connects the lower and upper boundaries.
output_boundary: boolean, optional(default=False)
If output_boundary is set to True. This function will output the
unique upper boundaries of discretized array. If it is set to False,
This funciton will output the discretized array.
For example, if it is set to True and the array is discretized into
3 groups (1,2),(2,3),(3,4), this funciton will output an array of
[1,3,4].
boundaries_: dict
A dictionary that maps feature name to its merged boundaries.
fit_sample_size_: int
The sampel size of fitted data.
transform_sample_size_: int
The sampel size of transformed data.
num_of_x_: int
The number of features.
columns_: iterable
An array of list of feature names.
fit(X, y):
fit the ChiMerge algorithm to the feature.
transform(X):
transform the feature using the ChiMerge fitted.
fit_transform(X, y):
fit the ChiMerge algorithm to the feature and transform it.
Visualizing feature event rate distribution to facilitate explainability evaluation.
x:numpy.ndarray or pandas.DataFrame, shape (number of examples,)
The feature to be visualized.
y:numpy.ndarray or pandas.DataFrame, shape (number of examples,)
The Dependent variable.
delimiter: string, optional(default='~')
The interval is representated by string (i.e. '1~2'),
which takes the form lower+delimiter+upper. This parameter
control the symbol that connects the lower and upper boundaries.
title: Python string. Optional.
The title of the plot. Default is ''.
x_label: Python string. Optional.
The label of the feature. Default is ''.
y_label: Python string. Optional.
The label of the dependent variable. Default is ''.
x_rotation: int. Optional.
The degree of rotation of x-axis ticks. Default is 0.
xticks: Python list of strings. Optional.
The tick labels on x-axis. Default is the unique values
of x (in the format of Python string).
figure_height: int. Optional.
The hight of the figure. Default is 4.
figure_width: int. Optional.
The width of the figure. Default is 6.
save: boolean. Optional.
Whether or not the figure is saved to a local positon.
Default is False.
path: Python string. Optional.
The local position path where the figure will be saved.
This should be set when parameter save is True. Default is ''.
f1_ax1: matplotlib.axes._subplots.AxesSubplot
The figure object is returned.
Perform WOE transformation for features and calculate the information value (IV) of features with reference to the target variable y.
epslon: float, optional(default=1e-10)
Replace 0 with a very small number during division
or logrithm to avoid infinite value.
output_dataframe: boolean, optional(default=False)
if output_dataframe is set to True. The transform() function will
return pandas.DataFrame. If it is set to False, the output will
be numpy ndarray.
iv_: a dictionary that contains feature names and their IV
result_dict_: a dictionary that contains feature names and
their WOE result tuple. Each WOE result tuple contains the
woe value dictionary and the iv for the feature.
fit(X, y):
fit the WOE transformation to the feature.
transform(X):
transform the feature using the WOE fitted.
fit_transform(X, y):
fit the WOE transformation to the feature and transform it.
Retrun a table of each feature' IV and their highly correlated features to help users select features.
trans_woe: scorecardbundle.feature_encoding.WOE.WOE_Encoder object,
The fitted WOE_Encoder object
encoded_X: numpy.ndarray or pandas.DataFrame,
The encoded features data
threshold_corr: float, optional(default=0.6)
The threshold of Pearson correlation coefficient. Exceeding
This threshold means the features are highly correlated.
result_selection: pandas.DataFrame,
The table that contains 4 columns. column factor contains the
feature names, column IV contains the IV of features,
column woe_dict contains the WOE values of features and
column corr_with contains the feature that are highly correlated
with this feature together with the correlation coefficients.
Take encoded features, fit a regression and turn it into a scorecard
woe_transformer: WOE transformer object from WOE module.
C: float, optional(Default=1.0)
regularization parameter in linear regression. Default value is 1.
A smaller value implies more regularization.
See details in scikit-learn document.
class_weight: dict, optional(default=None)
weights for each class of samples (e.g. {class_label: weight})
in linear regression. This is to deal with imbalanced training data.
Setting this parameter to 'auto' will aotumatically use
class_weight function from scikit-learn to calculate the weights.
The equivalent codes are:
>>> from sklearn.utils import class_weight
>>> class_weights = class_weight.compute_class_weight('balanced',
np.unique(y), y)
random_state: int, optional(default=None)
random seed in linear regression. See details in scikit-learn doc.
PDO: int, optional(default=-20)
Points to double odds. One of the parameters of Scorecard.
Default value is -20.
A positive value means the higher the scores, the lower
the probability of y being 1.
A negative value means the higher the scores, the higher
the probability of y being 1.
basePoints: int, optional(default=100)
the score for base odds(# of y=1/ # of y=0).
decimal: int, optional(default=0)
Control the number of decimals that the output scores have.
Default is 0 (no decimal).
start_points: boolean, optional(default=False)
There are two types of scorecards, with and without start points.
True means the scorecard will have a start poitns.
output_option: string, optional(default='excel')
Controls the output format of scorecard. For now 'excel' is
the only option.
output_path: string, optional(default=None)
The location to save the scorecard. e.g. r'D:\\Work\\jupyter\\'.
verbose: boolean, optioanl(default=False)
When verbose is set to False, the predict() method only returns
the total scores of samples. In this case the output of predict()
method will be numpy.array;
When verbose is set to True, the predict() method will return
the total scores, as well as the scores of each feature. In this case
The output of predict() method will be pandas.DataFrame in order to
specify the feature names.
delimiter: string, optional(default='~')
The feature interval encodings recorded in the WOE transformer and the feature
intervals in the scorecard rules ouptput are representated by string which
takes the form lower+delimiter+upper (i.e. '1~2', which means (1,2]).
This parameter control the symbol that connects the lower and upper boundaries.
woe_df_: pandas.DataFrame, the scorecard rules. The table has sort_values columns:
feature: feature name;
value: feature intervals that are open to the left and closed to the right;
woe: the woe encoding for each feature interval;
beta: the regression coefficients for each feature in the Logistic regression;
score: the assigned score for each feature interval;
AB_ : A and B when converting regression to scorecard.
fit(woed_X, y):
fit the Scorecard model.
predict(X_beforeWOE, load_scorecard=None):
Apply the model to the original feature
(before discretization and woe encoding).
If users choose to upload their own Scorecard rules,
they can pass a pandas.DataFrame to `load_scorecard`
parameter. The dataframe should contain columns
feature, value, woe, beta and score:
- feature: feature name;
- value: feature intervals that are open to the left and closed to the right;
- woe: the woe encoding for each feature interval;
- beta: the regression coefficients for each feature in the Logistic regression;
- score: the assigned score for each feature interval;
An example of Scorecard rules table (assumming there is only one feature):
feature value woe beta score
x1 30~inf 0.377563 0.631033 5.0
x1 20~30 1.351546 0.631033 37.0
x1 -inf~20 1.629890 0.631033 -17.0
Model evaluation for binary classification problem.
y_true: numpy.array, shape (number of examples,)
The target column (or dependent variable).
y_pred_proba: numpy.array, shape (number of examples,)
The score or probability output by the model. The probability
of y_true being 1 should increase as this value
increases.
If Scorecard model's parameter "PDO" is negative, then the higher the
model scores, the higher the probability of y_pred being 1. This Function
works fine.
However!!! if the parameter "PDO" is positive, then the higher
the model scores, the lower the probability of y_pred being 1. In this case,
just put a negative sign before the scores array and pass `-scores` as parameter
y_pred_proba of this function.
output_path: string, optional(default=None)
the location to save the plot, e.g. r'D:\\Work\\jupyter\\'.
ks_stat(): Return the k-s stat
plot_ks(): Draw k-s curve
plot_roc(): Draw ROC curve
plot_precision_recall(): Draw precision recall curve
plot_all(): Draw k-s, ROC curve, and precision recall curve