Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

compatibility with soul fire´d #44

Open
slovinsqui opened this issue Mar 18, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

compatibility with soul fire´d #44

slovinsqui opened this issue Mar 18, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@slovinsqui
Copy link

I just noticed the soulfork sets enemies on normal fire instead of blue fire
there´s a mod called soul fire´d that has an API for compatibility for that, it would be cool if you could add compatibility with it

https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc-mods/soul-fired

@Eman-3600
Copy link
Contributor

If they were to add that, they'd more likely do it for https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc-mods/on-soul-fire instead.

@Crystal-Spider
Copy link

However my mod makes it way easier to add compatibility for ;) Also my mod adds enchantments and the possibility to have a whole ecosystem of fires registered by other mods, possibly allowing in the future to have different tridents that set on different kind of fire. Furthermore it has a more consistent fire behavior.
Of course I know that 5M downloads vs 30k is a big difference. However consider the ease of use, that maybe by adding Soul Fire'd as an optional dependency it will help get more widespread and the potential long term investment, I'd at least consider it!

P.S. I take this comment to mention this issue to track its progresses.

@Eman-3600
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah perhaps. Honestly, a better thing to ask for is the ability to import it into a project to make addons.

@ImWhiff
Copy link

ImWhiff commented May 9, 2023

Me three begs the Soul fork to be compatible with Soul Fire'd 👉👈

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants