Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Solved] why acc can not reach at 93% #1

Open
Yuquan-Lu opened this issue Aug 30, 2019 · 8 comments
Open

[Solved] why acc can not reach at 93% #1

Yuquan-Lu opened this issue Aug 30, 2019 · 8 comments

Comments

@Yuquan-Lu
Copy link

acc can't reach at 93.%;this code i have run two times,i don't change any parameters.

@KuangenZhang
Copy link
Owner

KuangenZhang commented Sep 2, 2019

acc can't reach at 93.%;this code i have run two times,i don't change any parameters.

Thanks for your message. I will check the code recently. Moreover, how much did you achieve for classification accuracy?

@grxiao
Copy link

grxiao commented Sep 5, 2019

@KuangenZhang Hi,I run the baseline,and I got the result of 92.2%
image

@KuangenZhang
Copy link
Owner

@KuangenZhang Hi,I run the baseline,and I got the result of 92.2%
image
Hi, I will run the code again and check this issue. However, it is possible that the accuracy varies sometimes, and you can try to run the train.py for several times.

@KuangenZhang KuangenZhang reopened this Sep 6, 2019
@grxiao
Copy link

grxiao commented Sep 6, 2019

@KuangenZhang Hi,I run the baseline,and I got the result of 92.2%
image
Hi, I will run the code again and check this issue. However, it is possible that the accuracy varies sometimes, and you can try to run the train.py for several times.
Thanks for your reply and the sharing of the code.Thanks!

@KuangenZhang
Copy link
Owner

image
@grxiao @Yuquan-Lu
Hi, I have run the code again and shown the results in the above picture. The highest classification accuracy is 92.73%. The accuracy does vary around 92.5%. If you try to run the train.py for 3 to 4 times, you may get a satisfying training result.

@KuangenZhang
Copy link
Owner

KuangenZhang commented Sep 10, 2019

@Yuquan-Lu @grxiao
Moreover, I changed the batch_size to 16, which seems to increase the stability of the training result.

@grxiao
Copy link

grxiao commented Sep 11, 2019

@Yuquan-Lu @grxiao
Moreover, I changed the batch_size to 16, which seems to increase the stability of the training result.

thanks!

@KuangenZhang KuangenZhang reopened this Sep 12, 2019
@KuangenZhang KuangenZhang changed the title why acc can not reach at 93% [Solved] why acc can not reach at 93% Sep 16, 2019
@Yuquan-Lu
Copy link
Author

image
@grxiao @Yuquan-Lu
Hi, I have run the code again and shown the results in the above picture. The highest classification accuracy is 92.73%. The accuracy does vary around 92.5%. If you try to run the train.py for 3 to 4 times, you may get a satisfying training result.

I am very grateful for your reply, I will repeat the experiment several times.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants