Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PDF read support #105

Open
isaackwan opened this issue Nov 24, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

PDF read support #105

isaackwan opened this issue Nov 24, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@isaackwan
Copy link

Hello,

I realise PDF read support is not currently supported OOTB. Do you think that we could improve wasm-im to support this too?

Do you have a rough idea what it takes to get this implemented? If it's "easy" I might even try to take this on myself.

Thanks,
Isaac

@gallafent
Copy link

I'm also interested in this.

I was wondering whether there's a requirement for a third-party library to implement this, or whether it's built in. Initial investigation of the ImageMagick source indicates that it's using a built-in coder for this, implemented in https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/blob/6eea084fd9f9f1be258376547344ca199ddc4625/coders/pdf.c .

This led me to notice that this repo is now looking very abandoned / unmaintained, … being 1429 commits behind ImageMagick main, from which it was forked long long ago …

In turn, this led me to wonder which of the 51 forks is the most active, and so I took a look using an excellent tool called activeforks: https://techgaun.github.io/active-forks/index.html#KnicKnic/WASM-ImageMagick — and that leads me to this repository: https://github.com/gradualcolors/WASM-ImageMagick . This repo updated its ImageMagick very recently!

I'm therefore proposing to open a ticket equivalent to this, referencing this one, there, and also to open a ticket here suggesting that the readme of this project should indicate its dormancy and redirect to the active one.

Anyone that happens to catch this message and think there is a better / more complete / more active fork in which new activity should concentrate, of course, this would be very useful to know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants