You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not sure if this is an issue to raise in NaNMath.jl or here.
My first guess would be to overload NaNMath functions with Interval arguments as a package extension? Maybe such an overload would call the regular Julia functions back.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
NaNMath assumes that a Real converted with float becomes either a Float64 or a Float32. That is not currently the case for Intervals and causes the stack overflow.
NaNMath doesn't use functions from Base internally, so it currently can not reuse anything we have defined here for intervals. I don't know why it is so, but as long as it is, making them compatible would indeed require a package extension.
Having written some of my functions with
NaNMath.jl
versions of mathematical functions, feeding themInterval
s results in aStackOverflowError
.E.g.
Any possibility of future compatibility?
Not sure if this is an issue to raise in NaNMath.jl or here.
My first guess would be to overload NaNMath functions with
Interval
arguments as a package extension? Maybe such an overload would call the regular Julia functions back.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: