Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unnecesary licence files #122

Open
tecosaur opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Unnecesary licence files #122

tecosaur opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@tecosaur
Copy link
Contributor

tecosaur commented May 8, 2024

IANAL, but I noticed the licence files under data/ and to the best of my understanding neither particular colours nor colour schemes can be copyrighted (particular shades can be trademarked, but that's another matter). In the source repositories, the code surrounding the colours themselves may be covered by copyright, but not the colours themselves.

References:

  • Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices § 906.3 "Mere coloration or mere variations in coloring alone are not eligible for copyright protection"
  • In some recently outdated EUIPO guidelines I see "A single colour may of course be an element of a design, but on its own it does not comply with the definition of a design because it does not constitute the ‘appearance of a product’.", in the newer guidelines the only mention of colour I see is under the grounds for refusal.
  • Given the Berne Convention and the TRIPS Agreement, it seems wholly reasonable to presume that US copyright guidelines on colour extend internationally.

As such, while it's polite to note the source of the colours in the relevant files, I think actually copying the licences is a bit excessive and would advocate for their removal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant