You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I get a nice plot with legend G1 and G2 so I know which is which. Running
plot(step.([H, H2]))
does not give any. Easy to add in the call, but just felt if there are automatic labels for one one there might as well be for the other to be consistent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm opposed to automatic labels, because they behave very poorly if you call bodeplot twice. Also, if you plot and set a title, next call to bodeplot will override your title which is quite terrible.
I'm mostly arguing for consistency, so I'd be equally up for not having it anywhere (or maybe more now that I think about the problems it might cause).
I also favor consistency. Every time we've tried to be smart in the plot recipes it has backfired and been prone to breakage with time, so I'd really like to get rid of most of the smartness, like custom ticks, labels and latex stuff.
Have two systems H and H2 to compare. Running
bodeplot([H, H2])
I get a nice plot with legend G1 and G2 so I know which is which. Running
does not give any. Easy to add in the call, but just felt if there are automatic labels for one one there might as well be for the other to be consistent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: