Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrap for python std::vector<ImagePointer> in helper functions. #67

Open
phcerdan opened this issue Sep 27, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Wrap for python std::vector<ImagePointer> in helper functions. #67

phcerdan opened this issue Sep 27, 2017 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@phcerdan
Copy link
Collaborator

Asked in the discourse forum: https://discourse.itk.org/t/how-to-wrap-a-std-vector-imagepointer-in-swig-with-itkwrap/227

@phcerdan phcerdan changed the title Wrap std::vector<ImagePointer> in helper functions: GetOutputs(), SetInputs() Wrap for python std::vector<ImagePointer> in helper functions. Sep 27, 2017
@phcerdan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

phcerdan commented Nov 2, 2018

WIP in branch: https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITKIsotropicWavelets/tree/use_vector_container

This wip was using itkVectorContainer instead of std::vector. I think it would be better the std::vector option.

@phcerdan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@fbudin69500 merged in ITK an std::vector wrapping: InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK@bd8169b

We just need to figure out how to re-use the wrapping in an external module.

@dzenanz
Copy link
Member

dzenanz commented Jun 24, 2021

Can this issue be closed now?

@phcerdan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I don't think anything has changed to close it. Are open issues a burden? We can add a enhancement label to it, to differentiate them from bugs.

@dzenanz
Copy link
Member

dzenanz commented Jun 25, 2021

CI with Python packages built successfully, that's why I thought we could close a couple of these bugs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants