You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
i want to create an inverse transformation, thus i followed the example in "ITK_Example11_Transformix_DeformationField.ipynb".
I was wondering why the inverse transform ParameterObject is not initialized in the inversed order to the originally created tx,
e.g. i thought the inverse transform must be : inv_tx = affine(bsline(x))
I tested in binder if it makes any difference. The resulting deformation fields look similar but are not similar numerically.
So, does it make any difference what i create as ParameterObject() and what order would be technically correct?
Any clarification would be very appreciated :)
I attached my modifications of ur example for easy reproduction.
Hello :)
i want to create an inverse transformation, thus i followed the example in "ITK_Example11_Transformix_DeformationField.ipynb".
I was wondering why the inverse transform ParameterObject is not initialized in the inversed order to the originally created tx,
e.g. i thought the inverse transform must be : inv_tx = affine(bsline(x))
I tested in binder if it makes any difference. The resulting deformation fields look similar but are not similar numerically.
So, does it make any difference what i create as ParameterObject() and what order would be technically correct?
Any clarification would be very appreciated :)
I attached my modifications of ur example for easy reproduction.
ITK_Example11_Transformix_DeformationField.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: