-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 5 comments
-
Try this command:
Change to -density 960, -resize 25% for additional improvement. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Post one of your PDFs if the suggestion by urban-warrior does not help. Also provide your Ghostscript version. Some versions are known to be buggy. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you @urban-warrior, those modified settings improved the quality. The 480/50% setting still leaves a little disturbance behind, but is fast; the 960/25% setting improves further, but is much slower. I'll have to make a call which setting we can use feasibly in production. @fmw42, the Ghostscript version is 9.22. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think GS 9.22 is a one of the versions with known problems. I suggest you try with an older version (eg 9.19) or the current version. If you paste a link to a sample PDF, we can try with different GS versions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you, @snibgo and @fmw42, you were spot on. After downgrading to Ghostscript 9.19 portable and re-running the task with my original parameters I got a much better result, even better than with the 960 density setting: I can work with this result. Thank you very much everyone. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I think GS 9.22 is a one of the versions with known problems. I suggest you try with an older version (eg 9.19) or the current version.
If you paste a link to a sample PDF, we can try with different GS versions.