Using ITHACA-FV for a different CFD code? #507
UnnamedMoose
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Dear Artur,
ITHACA depends heavily on OpenFOAM. The reduced order
methodology implemented in the code is primarily intrusive: it is necessary
to know how to assemble the various discrete differential operators. Using
a different code (refresco) one could partially reuse some of the
functionalities (computation of POD modes and non-intrusive
functionalities) but for the rest of the code, one would need to redo a lot
of things that at the moment are working only with OpenFOAM.
I hope this helps.
Giovanni
Il giorno ven 16 set 2022 alle ore 18:51 Artur K Lidtke <
***@***.***> ha scritto:
… I am interested in applying the tools to a different in-house CFD code (
https://www.marin.nl/en/facilities-and-tools/software/refresco). I see
that ITHACA is dependent on the OpenFOAM source code, which is not a big
deal as far as compilation goes. However, I would like to supply the data
to the framework from a different CFD code, ideally without translating our
output cgns files to the OpenFOAM format for each and every case. Could you
please let me know how hard this would potentially be?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/mathLab/ITHACA-FV/discussions/507>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGAFEVWU6ZBLN5EBZQFB7DV6SQSHANCNFSM6AAAAAAQOPYDTM>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Giovanni Stabile, Ph.D., Dott. Ing.
Assistant Professor in Numerical Analysis (RTD-A)
SISSA mathLab, International School for Advanced Studies
Office A-712 (7th floor), via Bonomea 265, I-34136 Trieste, Italy
office: +39 040 3787 290 / mobile: +39 333 5273567 / ***@***.***:
***@***.***
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Hi,
I think starting with EZyRB is preferable in your case. In case you want to
discuss any specific problem or you are willing to develop any new
functionality do not hesitate to contact me (I am also working on the
development of EZyRB).
Best,
Giovanni
Il giorno lun 19 set 2022 alle ore 14:05 Artur K Lidtke <
***@***.***> ha scritto:
… Hi,
Thanks for the answer, that's a little bit what I feared :) Glad I asked
beforehand. I will stick with the non-intrusive approach for now using
EZyRB and see how far that takes me.
Kind regards,
Artur
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/mathLab/ITHACA-FV/discussions/507#discussioncomment-3680052>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGAFEXIAWOAJ7YPHGMUHDDV7BJKFANCNFSM6AAAAAAQOPYDTM>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
Giovanni Stabile
Via Baruffi, 7 - 50023 - Florence, Italy
mobile: +39 333 5273567 / ***@***.***: ***@***.***
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am interested in applying the tools to a different in-house CFD code (https://www.marin.nl/en/facilities-and-tools/software/refresco). I see that ITHACA is dependent on the OpenFOAM source code, which is not a big deal as far as compilation goes. However, I would like to supply the data to the framework from a different CFD code, ideally without translating our output cgns files to the OpenFOAM format for each and every case. Could you please let me know how hard this would potentially be?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions