Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question on re-use of tags #50

Open
orichters opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Question on re-use of tags #50

orichters opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@orichters
Copy link
Contributor

Dear @danielhuppmann,

I have a question regarding tags. For example, energy/tag_all_sectors.yaml contains Industry tags that will have substantial overlap with the tags used in the industry group and also the macro group will have Export|Industry|*. Can we use tags from other folders? Will there be tags that can be used in multiple variable groups? Or should we simply not care that much and you clean that up anyway? ;)

@orichters orichters changed the title Question on use of tags Question on re-use of tags Feb 9, 2024
@danielhuppmann
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the question.

The folder structure is irrelevant for the nomenclature package, it is only intended to support humans in understanding some hierarchy or sectoral clustering of variables. So you can re-use any tags across all sub-folders of each dimension (variable, region, ...).

Practically speaking, if there is a number of additional variables that only make sense for the industry sector, I suggest to "carve out" the list of industries from the Sector tag and create an own tag-list that you can reuse for the industry-specific variables - and duplicate all variables that currently use the Sector tag list with that additional Industry-Sector tag list.

I suggest the following:

  • identify the additional (sub)sectors and variables that you consider relevant for the common-definitions package
  • describe the changes in an issue and discuss there
  • if agreed, implement the described changes in small PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants