Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct particle count for PMT linearity #55

Open
153957 opened this issue Mar 8, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Correct particle count for PMT linearity #55

153957 opened this issue Mar 8, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@153957
Copy link
Member

153957 commented Mar 8, 2015

PMT response curves are not always linear.

This has an effect on both the pulse height and integral. Moreover the HiSPARC electronics have ADCs which only go to -2 V. Larger signals are saturated. We need to account for these effects.

Old power supplies:
screen shot 2015-03-08 at 16 32 04

New power supplies:
screen shot 2015-03-08 at 16 31 46

As can be seen the old power supply barely reaches 2 V, this differs from PMT to PMT, and may be influenced by the high voltage on the PMT. This means the signals are unlikely to reach the saturation threshold of the HiSPARC ADCs, this can easily be checked for detectors in the pulse height histograms. Saturated signals may require more effort to reconstruct.

Todo:

  • Account for ADC saturation
  • Account for non-linearity
    • Check pulse height versus pulse integral (if linear -> new pmt)
    • Check maximum pulse height
@153957
Copy link
Member Author

153957 commented Apr 19, 2015

A fit formula found in arXiv:1002.2442, eq 4. Seems to work well for fitting the pulseheight saturation. Not yet tested on pulse integral.

linearity_senstech

@davidfokkema
Copy link
Member

davidfokkema commented Apr 19, 2015 via email

@153957
Copy link
Member Author

153957 commented Apr 20, 2015

Also works for pulseintegrals.
linearity_senstech_integral_pi_90

Note that here, and in previous example, the p1 parameter was fixed (also to prevent possible division by 0). Varying it does not greatly affect the goodness of fit, mostly the magnitude of the p0 parameter..

@153957 153957 self-assigned this May 1, 2015
@153957
Copy link
Member Author

153957 commented May 2, 2016

A fit based on two linear lines connected by a circle segment (on log log axes) has replaced the fit shown in the previous comments. It has 3 degrees of freedom; intercept and slope of the second line and the radius of the circle. The first line intersects with (0, 0) and has a slope of 1 (i.e. x = y).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants