Switch to generated AlloyDBAdminAsyncClient over aiohttp.ClientSession
#221
Assignees
Labels
priority: p1
Important issue which blocks shipping the next release. Will be fixed prior to next release.
type: feature request
‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Comments
jackwotherspoon
added
type: feature request
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
AlloyDB has a generated package with support for an async client. Should look at switching to use it over the
aiohttp.ClientSessionthat is currently being used to hit the admin API endpoints. Will want to investigate performance a bit before committing to this switch in case it degrades the performance.AlloyDB Client package: https://pypi.org/project/google-cloud-alloydb/
Generated client: https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-python/blob/main/packages/google-cloud-alloydb/google/cloud/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: