Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 20, 2023. It is now read-only.

Inbox Redesign #2497

Open
1 of 5 tasks
Huddie opened this issue Nov 27, 2018 · 16 comments
Open
1 of 5 tasks

Inbox Redesign #2497

Huddie opened this issue Nov 27, 2018 · 16 comments
Assignees
Labels
🎨 design Changes to the design of the app 🆕 feature request A feature being requested to be added, not yet approved

Comments

@Huddie
Copy link
Collaborator

Huddie commented Nov 27, 2018

This comes from the #2177 thread.

Just thoughts on improving the inbox.

Related Issues:

We should try to think about #620, this is where we redesigned away from complexity.
In the past Ryan has thrown a few design out to the twitterverse to see what people liked. I think that makes sense here as well.

@kocheck will hopefully mock up a few designs. If anyone has thoughts or suggestions comment away!

@Huddie Huddie added 🆕 feature request A feature being requested to be added, not yet approved 🎯 project management Project and Codebase management, cleanup and future vision labels Nov 27, 2018
@Huddie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Huddie commented Nov 28, 2018

Just a quick update from #2413 to keep things up to date here.

Ryan suggested using the navigation bar drop down that we see throughout the app in the inbox and when you click it your presented with a context menu where you can select different inbox modes.

Modes being:

  • Master list
  • Notifications
  • Assigned
  • Mentioned
  • etc

A new request would go out with each reload of the inbox since we wouldn’t be doing intense filtering in-app (GitHub’s api allows for a filter parameter)

@rnystrom currently drop down opens action sheet, context menu would be different from the norm.
Do we mind? Do we want to switch all action sheets to context menu (as maybe a later goal)?

Sent with GitHawk

@rnystrom
Copy link
Member

Menu would give us a ton more options w/ the UI (icons, selection indicator, section headers, etc)

@rnystrom
Copy link
Member

Open to considering large titles for inbox too

@rnystrom rnystrom added 🎨 design Changes to the design of the app and removed 🎯 project management Project and Codebase management, cleanup and future vision labels Nov 29, 2018
@kocheck
Copy link
Collaborator

kocheck commented Nov 30, 2018

Design should also consider how issue #2473 would affect this screen as well 👍

@kocheck kocheck self-assigned this Nov 30, 2018
@rnystrom rnystrom added 👍 feature approved Features approved for implementation 🆕 feature request A feature being requested to be added, not yet approved and removed 🆕 feature request A feature being requested to be added, not yet approved 👍 feature approved Features approved for implementation labels Dec 2, 2018
@kocheck
Copy link
Collaborator

kocheck commented Dec 17, 2018

Wanted to post an update, Still working on this over/in-between the holidays. Hope to have some ideas out to talk with ya'll soon.

@ijm8710
Copy link

ijm8710 commented Dec 17, 2018

Just make sure you’re on latest TF as some of the OP has changed :)

@kocheck
Copy link
Collaborator

kocheck commented Dec 17, 2018

Nice!

Sent with GitHawk

@j-f1
Copy link

j-f1 commented Dec 17, 2018

The recent update has kind of broken my workflow. I usually go through my notifications by selecting each repo individually. Now, it’s hard to find the repos in my giant list of watched repositories.

@kocheck
Copy link
Collaborator

kocheck commented Dec 17, 2018

Thank you @j-f1 I will add that to my notes as well! Good point.

Sent with GitHawk

@kocheck kocheck pinned this issue Dec 24, 2018
@kocheck kocheck unpinned this issue Dec 24, 2018
@kocheck
Copy link
Collaborator

kocheck commented Dec 24, 2018

Reading through all the additional issues and taking notes to make some soft design requirements. I have a question for whomever it may concern. ✌️

Reading through the issues I have an idea to make the inbox more flexible for different workflows. How do you folks feel about allowing the user to choose what mode should be default in the inbox?
So for me, I like to have a repo overview. It looks like some people like to see what they are assigned and what they are subscribed to.

Does that make any sense?

Sent with GitHawk

@Huddie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Huddie commented Dec 24, 2018

Makes sense to me @kocheck

@ijm8710
Copy link

ijm8710 commented Jan 21, 2019

Would it make potential sense to have the repos drop down list both starred repos in addition to watched repos. Or would you want those just moreso accessible from revised wireframe profiles in #2106?

@kocheck
Copy link
Collaborator

kocheck commented Jan 22, 2019

I like that idea @ijm8710 Do you think we would need some sort of search feature then? I know for some users that I have seen, the Stars list gets quite long.

@ijm8710
Copy link

ijm8710 commented Jan 22, 2019

That or a scroller wouldn’t hurt if that’s the case

@Huddie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Huddie commented Jan 22, 2019

@kocheck There is actually an issue that requests the search in the context-menu feature. I think search is a good addition

@kocheck
Copy link
Collaborator

kocheck commented Jan 22, 2019

Oh I will add that to my wireframes then. I think that could be useful in the long run.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
🎨 design Changes to the design of the app 🆕 feature request A feature being requested to be added, not yet approved
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants