You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I like the idea of blocks in Gistbooks being independent, so you could, for instance, show two outputs on the same Gistbook. That seems really useful.
I also like the idea of the blocks being together, so you could break up definitions into multiple 'files' to be executed together.
How could I incorporate this into the gistbook format? One solution might be "sections" and "blocks" (the naming may need some work). Using the current naming, a section would enclose multiple blocks. Each section would have an output (an iFrame). You could execute the sections independently of one another.
The demarcation between sections could be a dark, 1px line that spans the whole width of the gistbook. Sections might also have titles.
But maybe I shouldn't do this? This is technically creating sub-books within a book. It also adds complexity to the interface. Maybe users should always create n Gistbooks if they want n outputs...hmmm...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I like the idea of blocks in Gistbooks being independent, so you could, for instance, show two outputs on the same Gistbook. That seems really useful.
I also like the idea of the blocks being together, so you could break up definitions into multiple 'files' to be executed together.
How could I incorporate this into the gistbook format? One solution might be "sections" and "blocks" (the naming may need some work). Using the current naming, a section would enclose multiple blocks. Each section would have an output (an iFrame). You could execute the sections independently of one another.
The demarcation between sections could be a dark, 1px line that spans the whole width of the gistbook. Sections might also have titles.
But maybe I shouldn't do this? This is technically creating sub-books within a book. It also adds complexity to the interface. Maybe users should always create
n
Gistbooks if they wantn
outputs...hmmm...The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: