Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for more than 2 groups #43

Open
mihagazvoda opened this issue Nov 14, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Support for more than 2 groups #43

mihagazvoda opened this issue Nov 14, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@mihagazvoda
Copy link

Hi!
Since a lot of AB tests involve more than 2 groups, have you thought about adding support for more 2 groups? Or do you advise using the current structure and just compare all groups to A?

Thank you for creating the package.

Best,
Miha

@jenslaufer
Copy link

+1

@FrankPortman
Copy link
Owner

Hi guys - totally open to a change like this if it's handled elegantly with as little disruption as possible to current API/docs. I assume it won't be possible to do it 100% seamlessly and keep all examples the same and therefore will be considered a pretty major release.

There is also the possibility of adding hierarchical partial pooling and hyperpiors, if we have more than 2 groups. This would mean changing the backend and possibly losing some of the closed form conjugate solutions. But perhaps worth augmenting the library with that as well. Maybe as an option that externs to some MCMC library.

Personally I have no time to do either of these 2 but I would be happy to support one or both of these approaches with high level feedback and in-depth code reviews if somebody else wants to give it a shot.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants