Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates to output file, naming conventions #70

Open
kdraeder opened this issue Aug 12, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Updates to output file, naming conventions #70

kdraeder opened this issue Aug 12, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@kdraeder
Copy link

http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm2/naming_conventions.html#modelOutputFilenames
says that

a new metadata field called time_period_freq is now written to every history file header with one of the corresponding values:

second_N... N ∈ {1..3599} - data are written every N seconds

...
But this is not true for the cpl.hi. files, which seem to contain
instantaneous values.

It would also be helpful to have either a description of the meaning
of the standard characters that follow .h, (a,i,0-9,...) or pointers to that information,
like
http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm2/component_settings/cam_nml.html:fincl1
for the first CAM history file.
Similarly, it would be helpful to update the driver namelist documentation
http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm2/component_settings/drv_nml.html:history_option
to note that the output will appear in a .hi. file.
Similarly for the cpl.ha* files.

I wouldn't mind writing some of that documentation,
but I can't find the source code for pages like these.
They are not in the CESM2_0 release.
Thanks,
Kevin

@kdraeder
Copy link
Author

@billsacks @gold2718
This issue seems to have not grabbed anyone's attention since I opened it,
maybe because I don't have permission to assign, choose tags, etc.
(see https://github.com/ESCOMP/escomp.github.io #1).
Or maybe it's just way down on the priority list.
So I'm pinging you to make sure someone knows about it (them).
Thanks,
Kevin

@billsacks
Copy link
Member

I'm tentatively assigning this to @bertinia . Alice, are you able to look into this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Needs Prioritization
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants