Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Turn tables with OGC endpoints into text files #10

Open
salvafern opened this issue Mar 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Turn tables with OGC endpoints into text files #10

salvafern opened this issue Mar 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@salvafern
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @tim-collart

Question coming from EMODnet/EMODnetWFS#139

Would you agree with turning the tables in the README containing the endpoints for WFS etc into csv or other tabulated file format?

Reason:
The most up-to-date place where the endpoints of EMODnet are seems to be this repo. We (me and @maelle ) could not figure out how to get such an updated list from geonetwork (See EMODnet/EMODnetWFS#129 (comment)).

We know that eventually geonetwork will be the best place to get such a list, but for the time being we are struggling to keep up with updated services as we are normally not notified of any change, hence we only get to know via CI/CD errors in the EMODnetWFS repo. Which is quite frustrating tbh.

Proposal:
If you agreed I would suggest one of these ideas to read the csv file with the endpoints

  1. Turn the README into a RMarkdown document (currently plain markdown). Read the file as a data frame and knit to a markdown document.
  2. Use a github action that turns the csv into a markdown table and injects into the README.md with every commit.

Thanks in advance and let me know you agree. Happy to give it a try and do a PR.

@salvafern salvafern added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Mar 24, 2023
salvafern added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 6, 2023
@salvafern
Copy link
Contributor Author

I gave it a try and added a PR #11 :) the README.md is exactly the same and the effort to update is minimal

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants