Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reconsider link storage #48

Open
mshmsh5000 opened this issue Jan 31, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Reconsider link storage #48

mshmsh5000 opened this issue Jan 31, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@mshmsh5000
Copy link
Contributor

We use a Redis store for the shortened links. There were two reasons we made this choice:

  1. The data model couldn't be simpler, so we wanted a simple storage technology
  2. We need the most lightweight storage possible, given the very bursty write patterns during SMS broadcasts

After running this in production for 9+ months, we've seen the database grow to nearly 15 GB. The cap at Compose, where this is hosted, is 17 GB.

Let's think about the right choice for this use case, in terms of

  • Scalability
  • Operational cost
  • Hosting options
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant