Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test for Hybrid model must be extended for a range of Re numbers #85

Open
Niceno opened this issue Nov 16, 2018 · 6 comments
Open

Test for Hybrid model must be extended for a range of Re numbers #85

Niceno opened this issue Nov 16, 2018 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Niceno
Copy link
Collaborator

Niceno commented Nov 16, 2018

Hi guys,

At present we have two tests for Hybrid model, one on uniform, one for stretched grid. However, it would be very advantageous and convincing if we had many Reynolds numbers. Connected to that, I have some concerns:

  1. If we are going to provide cases for a number of Re numbers, what shall we put as data to compare with? I assume some DNS databases, right?
  2. If we are going for DNS databases, which would they be? At the time when I was a PhD student there was a database for Re_Tau=180, Re_Tau=590 came a bit later, and after my graduation I also saw Re_Tau=1080. Anything newer and bigger on the market?

Cheers

@palkinev
Copy link
Collaborator

Last time I searched for DNS Channel database it was Re_tau = 2300+.

@mhadziabdic
Copy link
Collaborator

mhadziabdic commented Nov 16, 2018 via email

@Niceno
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Niceno commented Nov 16, 2018

I would run different Re numbers (three at least) to convince some people at PSI to use T-Flows. So ... maybe I will say something stupid, but I reckon it would be nice if we had:

  • Re_Tau = 590
  • Re_Tau = 1080 (I think there was such a database)
  • Re_Tau = 2300 (the one Egor suggests)

Egor, what is the database you are referring to? Is there a reference?

@mhadziabdic
Copy link
Collaborator

mhadziabdic commented Nov 16, 2018 via email

@Niceno
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Niceno commented Nov 17, 2018

I was peeking around a little bit to find a DNS database we could use. I encountered a few, but this one from Politechnical University of Madrid seems to be the most comprehensive for our needs:
https://torroja.dmt.upm.es/channels/data/

Do you guys know anything about it? Is this database cited, acknowledged, praised? They did publish in good journals, I see Physics of Fluids, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

@mhadziabdic
Copy link
Collaborator

mhadziabdic commented Nov 17, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants