You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When using directPrintPdf you are unable to specify number of copies.
Describe the solution you'd like
in printing/windows/print_job.cpp on lines 114-132 it seems to be that this is an option that can be specified since nCopies is set to a default of 1 when using layoutPdf to print using a print dialog. I do not know C++ so I realise I might be wrong but to me this indicates it is a parameter that can be specified.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I have read previous closed issues where using a for loop in dart to send multiple identical printjobs was suggested but it seems to me this is worse practice, or is the result identical from the printer/printer-driver's point of view?
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Any updates on this feature?? I'm using the for loop right now, but I've noticed that printing is slower this way than when you set the number of copies in the iOS popup.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When using directPrintPdf you are unable to specify number of copies.Describe the solution you'd like
in printing/windows/print_job.cpp on lines 114-132 it seems to be that this is an option that can be specified since nCopies is set to a default of 1 when using layoutPdf to print using a print dialog. I do not know C++ so I realise I might be wrong but to me this indicates it is a parameter that can be specified.Describe alternatives you've considered
I have read previous closed issues where using a for loop in dart to send multiple identical printjobs was suggested but it seems to me this is worse practice, or is the result identical from the printer/printer-driver's point of view?Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: