Auto Network Selection #2
Comments
|
Yes. I having the same issue here.. even with stable or nightly version..The rest is all ok expect this issue... Excellent ROM !!! Kudos to you guys.. |
crpalmer
pushed a commit
to crpalmer/android_kernel_asus_moorefield
that referenced
this issue
Feb 8, 2016
commit 6fdda9a9c5db367130cf32df5d6618d08b89f46a upstream.
As part of normal operaions, the hrtimer subsystem frequently calls
into the timekeeping code, creating a locking order of
hrtimer locks -> timekeeping locks
clock_was_set_delayed() was suppoed to allow us to avoid deadlocks
between the timekeeping the hrtimer subsystem, so that we could
notify the hrtimer subsytem the time had changed while holding
the timekeeping locks. This was done by scheduling delayed work
that would run later once we were out of the timekeeing code.
But unfortunately the lock chains are complex enoguh that in
scheduling delayed work, we end up eventually trying to grab
an hrtimer lock.
Sasha Levin noticed this in testing when the new seqlock lockdep
enablement triggered the following (somewhat abrieviated) message:
[ 251.100221] ======================================================
[ 251.100221] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 251.100221] 3.13.0-rc2-next-20131206-sasha-00005-g8be2375-dirty #4053 Not tainted
[ 251.101967] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 251.101967] kworker/10:1/4506 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 251.101967] (timekeeper_seq){----..}, at: [<ffffffff81160e96>] retrigger_next_event+0x56/0x70
[ 251.101967]
[ 251.101967] but task is already holding lock:
[ 251.101967] (hrtimer_bases.lock#11){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81160e7c>] retrigger_next_event+0x3c/0x70
[ 251.101967]
[ 251.101967] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 251.101967]
[ 251.101967]
[ 251.101967] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 251.101967]
-> CyanogenMod#5 (hrtimer_bases.lock#11){-.-...}:
[snipped]
-> CyanogenMod#4 (&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock){-.-...}:
[snipped]
-> CyanogenMod#3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
[snipped]
-> CyanogenMod#2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}:
[snipped]
-> CyanogenMod#1 (&(&pool->lock)->rlock){-.-...}:
[ 251.101967] [<ffffffff81194803>] validate_chain+0x6c3/0x7b0
[ 251.101967] [<ffffffff81194d9d>] __lock_acquire+0x4ad/0x580
[ 251.101967] [<ffffffff81194ff2>] lock_acquire+0x182/0x1d0
[ 251.101967] [<ffffffff84398500>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
[ 251.101967] [<ffffffff81153e69>] __queue_work+0x1a9/0x3f0
[ 251.101967] [<ffffffff81154168>] queue_work_on+0x98/0x120
[ 251.101967] [<ffffffff81161351>] clock_was_set_delayed+0x21/0x30
[ 251.101967] [<ffffffff811c4bd1>] do_adjtimex+0x111/0x160
[ 251.101967] [<ffffffff811e2711>] compat_sys_adjtimex+0x41/0x70
[ 251.101967] [<ffffffff843a4b49>] ia32_sysret+0x0/0x5
[ 251.101967]
-> #0 (timekeeper_seq){----..}:
[snipped]
[ 251.101967] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 251.101967]
[ 251.101967] Chain exists of:
timekeeper_seq --> &rt_b->rt_runtime_lock --> hrtimer_bases.lock#11
[ 251.101967] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 251.101967]
[ 251.101967] CPU0 CPU1
[ 251.101967] ---- ----
[ 251.101967] lock(hrtimer_bases.lock#11);
[ 251.101967] lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
[ 251.101967] lock(hrtimer_bases.lock#11);
[ 251.101967] lock(timekeeper_seq);
[ 251.101967]
[ 251.101967] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 251.101967]
[ 251.101967] 3 locks held by kworker/10:1/4506:
[ 251.101967] #0: (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81154960>] process_one_work+0x200/0x530
[ 251.101967] CyanogenMod#1: (hrtimer_work){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81154960>] process_one_work+0x200/0x530
[ 251.101967] CyanogenMod#2: (hrtimer_bases.lock#11){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81160e7c>] retrigger_next_event+0x3c/0x70
[ 251.101967]
[ 251.101967] stack backtrace:
[ 251.101967] CPU: 10 PID: 4506 Comm: kworker/10:1 Not tainted 3.13.0-rc2-next-20131206-sasha-00005-g8be2375-dirty #4053
[ 251.101967] Workqueue: events clock_was_set_work
So the best solution is to avoid calling clock_was_set_delayed() while
holding the timekeeping lock, and instead using a flag variable to
decide if we should call clock_was_set() once we've released the locks.
This works for the case here, where the do_adjtimex() was the deadlock
trigger point. Unfortuantely, in update_wall_time() we still hold
the jiffies lock, which would deadlock with the ipi triggered by
clock_was_set(), preventing us from calling it even after we drop the
timekeeping lock. So instead call clock_was_set_delayed() at that point.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
crpalmer
pushed a commit
to crpalmer/android_kernel_asus_moorefield
that referenced
this issue
Feb 8, 2016
commit 0b462c89e31f7eb6789713437eb551833ee16ff3 upstream. While a queue is being destroyed, all the blkgs are destroyed and its ->root_blkg pointer is set to NULL. If someone else starts to drain while the queue is in this state, the following oops happens. NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000028 IP: [<ffffffff8144e944>] blk_throtl_drain+0x84/0x230 PGD e4a1067 PUD b773067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [CyanogenMod#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: cfq_iosched(-) [last unloaded: cfq_iosched] CPU: 1 PID: 537 Comm: bash Not tainted 3.16.0-rc3-work+ CyanogenMod#2 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 task: ffff88000e222250 ti: ffff88000efd4000 task.ti: ffff88000efd4000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8144e944>] [<ffffffff8144e944>] blk_throtl_drain+0x84/0x230 RSP: 0018:ffff88000efd7bf0 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880015091450 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff88000efd7c10 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffff88000e222250 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880015091450 R13: ffff880015092e00 R14: ffff880015091d70 R15: ffff88001508fc28 FS: 00007f1332650740(0000) GS:ffff88001fa80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 0000000000000028 CR3: 0000000009446000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 Stack: ffffffff8144e8f6 ffff880015091450 0000000000000000 ffff880015091d80 ffff88000efd7c28 ffffffff8144ae2f ffff880015091450 ffff88000efd7c58 ffffffff81427641 ffff880015091450 ffffffff82401f00 ffff880015091450 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8144ae2f>] blkcg_drain_queue+0x1f/0x60 [<ffffffff81427641>] __blk_drain_queue+0x71/0x180 [<ffffffff81429b3e>] blk_queue_bypass_start+0x6e/0xb0 [<ffffffff814498b8>] blkcg_deactivate_policy+0x38/0x120 [<ffffffff8144ec44>] blk_throtl_exit+0x34/0x50 [<ffffffff8144aea5>] blkcg_exit_queue+0x35/0x40 [<ffffffff8142d476>] blk_release_queue+0x26/0xd0 [<ffffffff81454968>] kobject_cleanup+0x38/0x70 [<ffffffff81454848>] kobject_put+0x28/0x60 [<ffffffff81427505>] blk_put_queue+0x15/0x20 [<ffffffff817d07bb>] scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x16b/0x1c0 [<ffffffff810bc339>] execute_in_process_context+0x89/0xa0 [<ffffffff817d064c>] scsi_device_dev_release+0x1c/0x20 [<ffffffff817930e2>] device_release+0x32/0xa0 [<ffffffff81454968>] kobject_cleanup+0x38/0x70 [<ffffffff81454848>] kobject_put+0x28/0x60 [<ffffffff817934d7>] put_device+0x17/0x20 [<ffffffff817d11b9>] __scsi_remove_device+0xa9/0xe0 [<ffffffff817d121b>] scsi_remove_device+0x2b/0x40 [<ffffffff817d1257>] sdev_store_delete+0x27/0x30 [<ffffffff81792ca8>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30 [<ffffffff8126f75e>] sysfs_kf_write+0x3e/0x50 [<ffffffff8126ea87>] kernfs_fop_write+0xe7/0x170 [<ffffffff811f5e9f>] vfs_write+0xaf/0x1d0 [<ffffffff811f69bd>] SyS_write+0x4d/0xc0 [<ffffffff81d24692>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b 776687bce42b ("block, blk-mq: draining can't be skipped even if bypass_depth was non-zero") made it easier to trigger this bug by making blk_queue_bypass_start() drain even when it loses the first bypass test to blk_cleanup_queue(); however, the bug has always been there even before the commit as blk_queue_bypass_start() could race against queue destruction, win the initial bypass test but perform the actual draining after blk_cleanup_queue() already destroyed all blkgs. Fix it by skippping calling into policy draining if all the blkgs are already gone. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reported-by: Shirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Reported-by: Jet Chen <jet.chen@intel.com> Tested-by: Shirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
crpalmer
pushed a commit
to crpalmer/android_kernel_asus_moorefield
that referenced
this issue
Feb 8, 2016
commit 504d58745c9ca28d33572e2d8a9990b43e06075d upstream. clockevents_increase_min_delta() calls printk() from under hrtimer_bases.lock. That causes lock inversion on scheduler locks because printk() can call into the scheduler. Lockdep puts it as: ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.15.0-rc8-06195-g939f04b CyanogenMod#2 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- trinity-main/74 is trying to acquire lock: (&port_lock_key){-.....}, at: [<811c60be>] serial8250_console_write+0x8c/0x10c but task is already holding lock: (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}, at: [<8103caeb>] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x13/0x66 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> CyanogenMod#5 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}: [<8104a942>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x101 [<8142f11d>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2e/0x3e [<8103c918>] __hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x1c/0x197 [<8107ec20>] perf_swevent_start_hrtimer.part.41+0x7a/0x85 [<81080792>] task_clock_event_start+0x3a/0x3f [<810807a4>] task_clock_event_add+0xd/0x14 [<8108259a>] event_sched_in+0xb6/0x17a [<810826a2>] group_sched_in+0x44/0x122 [<81082885>] ctx_sched_in.isra.67+0x105/0x11f [<810828e6>] perf_event_sched_in.isra.70+0x47/0x4b [<81082bf6>] __perf_install_in_context+0x8b/0xa3 [<8107eb8e>] remote_function+0x12/0x2a [<8105f5af>] smp_call_function_single+0x2d/0x53 [<8107e17d>] task_function_call+0x30/0x36 [<8107fb82>] perf_install_in_context+0x87/0xbb [<810852c9>] SYSC_perf_event_open+0x5c6/0x701 [<810856f9>] SyS_perf_event_open+0x17/0x19 [<8142f8ee>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb -> CyanogenMod#4 (&ctx->lock){......}: [<8104a942>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x101 [<8142f04c>] _raw_spin_lock+0x21/0x30 [<81081df3>] __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x1dc/0x34f [<8142cacc>] __schedule+0x4c6/0x4cb [<8142cae0>] schedule+0xf/0x11 [<8142f9a6>] work_resched+0x5/0x30 -> CyanogenMod#3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}: [<8104a942>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x101 [<8142f04c>] _raw_spin_lock+0x21/0x30 [<81040873>] __task_rq_lock+0x33/0x3a [<8104184c>] wake_up_new_task+0x25/0xc2 [<8102474b>] do_fork+0x15c/0x2a0 [<810248a9>] kernel_thread+0x1a/0x1f [<814232a2>] rest_init+0x1a/0x10e [<817af949>] start_kernel+0x303/0x308 [<817af2ab>] i386_start_kernel+0x79/0x7d -> CyanogenMod#2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-...}: [<8104a942>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x101 [<8142f11d>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2e/0x3e [<810413dd>] try_to_wake_up+0x1d/0xd6 [<810414cd>] default_wake_function+0xb/0xd [<810461f3>] __wake_up_common+0x39/0x59 [<81046346>] __wake_up+0x29/0x3b [<811b8733>] tty_wakeup+0x49/0x51 [<811c3568>] uart_write_wakeup+0x17/0x19 [<811c5dc1>] serial8250_tx_chars+0xbc/0xfb [<811c5f28>] serial8250_handle_irq+0x54/0x6a [<811c5f57>] serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x19/0x1c [<811c56d8>] serial8250_interrupt+0x38/0x9e [<810510e7>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x5f/0x1e2 [<81051296>] handle_irq_event+0x2c/0x43 [<81052cee>] handle_level_irq+0x57/0x80 [<81002a72>] handle_irq+0x46/0x5c [<810027df>] do_IRQ+0x32/0x89 [<8143036e>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x33 [<8142f23c>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x49 [<811c25a4>] uart_start+0x2d/0x32 [<811c2c04>] uart_write+0xc7/0xd6 [<811bc6f6>] n_tty_write+0xb8/0x35e [<811b9beb>] tty_write+0x163/0x1e4 [<811b9cd9>] redirected_tty_write+0x6d/0x75 [<810b6ed6>] vfs_write+0x75/0xb0 [<810b7265>] SyS_write+0x44/0x77 [<8142f8ee>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb -> CyanogenMod#1 (&tty->write_wait){-.....}: [<8104a942>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x101 [<8142f11d>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2e/0x3e [<81046332>] __wake_up+0x15/0x3b [<811b8733>] tty_wakeup+0x49/0x51 [<811c3568>] uart_write_wakeup+0x17/0x19 [<811c5dc1>] serial8250_tx_chars+0xbc/0xfb [<811c5f28>] serial8250_handle_irq+0x54/0x6a [<811c5f57>] serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x19/0x1c [<811c56d8>] serial8250_interrupt+0x38/0x9e [<810510e7>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x5f/0x1e2 [<81051296>] handle_irq_event+0x2c/0x43 [<81052cee>] handle_level_irq+0x57/0x80 [<81002a72>] handle_irq+0x46/0x5c [<810027df>] do_IRQ+0x32/0x89 [<8143036e>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x33 [<8142f23c>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x49 [<811c25a4>] uart_start+0x2d/0x32 [<811c2c04>] uart_write+0xc7/0xd6 [<811bc6f6>] n_tty_write+0xb8/0x35e [<811b9beb>] tty_write+0x163/0x1e4 [<811b9cd9>] redirected_tty_write+0x6d/0x75 [<810b6ed6>] vfs_write+0x75/0xb0 [<810b7265>] SyS_write+0x44/0x77 [<8142f8ee>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb -> #0 (&port_lock_key){-.....}: [<8104a62d>] __lock_acquire+0x9ea/0xc6d [<8104a942>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x101 [<8142f11d>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2e/0x3e [<811c60be>] serial8250_console_write+0x8c/0x10c [<8104e402>] call_console_drivers.constprop.31+0x87/0x118 [<8104f5d5>] console_unlock+0x1d7/0x398 [<8104fb70>] vprintk_emit+0x3da/0x3e4 [<81425f76>] printk+0x17/0x19 [<8105bfa0>] clockevents_program_min_delta+0x104/0x116 [<8105c548>] clockevents_program_event+0xe7/0xf3 [<8105cc1c>] tick_program_event+0x1e/0x23 [<8103c43c>] hrtimer_force_reprogram+0x88/0x8f [<8103c49e>] __remove_hrtimer+0x5b/0x79 [<8103cb21>] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x49/0x66 [<8103cb4b>] hrtimer_cancel+0xd/0x18 [<8107f102>] perf_swevent_cancel_hrtimer.part.60+0x2b/0x30 [<81080705>] task_clock_event_stop+0x20/0x64 [<81080756>] task_clock_event_del+0xd/0xf [<81081350>] event_sched_out+0xab/0x11e [<810813e0>] group_sched_out+0x1d/0x66 [<81081682>] ctx_sched_out+0xaf/0xbf [<81081e04>] __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x1ed/0x34f [<8142cacc>] __schedule+0x4c6/0x4cb [<8142cae0>] schedule+0xf/0x11 [<8142f9a6>] work_resched+0x5/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &port_lock_key --> &ctx->lock --> hrtimer_bases.lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(hrtimer_bases.lock); lock(&ctx->lock); lock(hrtimer_bases.lock); lock(&port_lock_key); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by trinity-main/74: #0: (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<8142c6f3>] __schedule+0xed/0x4cb CyanogenMod#1: (&ctx->lock){......}, at: [<81081df3>] __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x1dc/0x34f CyanogenMod#2: (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}, at: [<8103caeb>] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x13/0x66 CyanogenMod#3: (console_lock){+.+...}, at: [<8104fb5d>] vprintk_emit+0x3c7/0x3e4 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 74 Comm: trinity-main Not tainted 3.15.0-rc8-06195-g939f04b CyanogenMod#2 00000000 81c3a310 8b995c14 81426f69 8b995c44 81425a99 8161f671 8161f570 8161f538 8161f559 8161f538 8b995c78 8b142bb0 00000004 8b142fdc 8b142bb0 8b995ca8 8104a62d 8b142fac 000016f2 81c3a310 00000001 00000001 00000003 Call Trace: [<81426f69>] dump_stack+0x16/0x18 [<81425a99>] print_circular_bug+0x18f/0x19c [<8104a62d>] __lock_acquire+0x9ea/0xc6d [<8104a942>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x101 [<811c60be>] ? serial8250_console_write+0x8c/0x10c [<811c6032>] ? wait_for_xmitr+0x76/0x76 [<8142f11d>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2e/0x3e [<811c60be>] ? serial8250_console_write+0x8c/0x10c [<811c60be>] serial8250_console_write+0x8c/0x10c [<8104af87>] ? lock_release+0x191/0x223 [<811c6032>] ? wait_for_xmitr+0x76/0x76 [<8104e402>] call_console_drivers.constprop.31+0x87/0x118 [<8104f5d5>] console_unlock+0x1d7/0x398 [<8104fb70>] vprintk_emit+0x3da/0x3e4 [<81425f76>] printk+0x17/0x19 [<8105bfa0>] clockevents_program_min_delta+0x104/0x116 [<8105cc1c>] tick_program_event+0x1e/0x23 [<8103c43c>] hrtimer_force_reprogram+0x88/0x8f [<8103c49e>] __remove_hrtimer+0x5b/0x79 [<8103cb21>] hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x49/0x66 [<8103cb4b>] hrtimer_cancel+0xd/0x18 [<8107f102>] perf_swevent_cancel_hrtimer.part.60+0x2b/0x30 [<81080705>] task_clock_event_stop+0x20/0x64 [<81080756>] task_clock_event_del+0xd/0xf [<81081350>] event_sched_out+0xab/0x11e [<810813e0>] group_sched_out+0x1d/0x66 [<81081682>] ctx_sched_out+0xaf/0xbf [<81081e04>] __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x1ed/0x34f [<8104416d>] ? __dequeue_entity+0x23/0x27 [<81044505>] ? pick_next_task_fair+0xb1/0x120 [<8142cacc>] __schedule+0x4c6/0x4cb [<81047574>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0xd7/0x108 [<810475b0>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [<81056346>] ? rcu_irq_exit+0x64/0x77 Fix the problem by using printk_deferred() which does not call into the scheduler. Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
crpalmer
pushed a commit
to crpalmer/android_kernel_asus_moorefield
that referenced
this issue
Feb 8, 2016
commit 2a1b4cf2331d92bc009bf94fa02a24604cdaf24c upstream. While a queue is being destroyed, all the blkgs are destroyed and its ->root_blkg pointer is set to NULL. If someone else starts to drain while the queue is in this state, the following oops happens. NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000028 IP: [<ffffffff8144e944>] blk_throtl_drain+0x84/0x230 PGD e4a1067 PUD b773067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [CyanogenMod#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: cfq_iosched(-) [last unloaded: cfq_iosched] CPU: 1 PID: 537 Comm: bash Not tainted 3.16.0-rc3-work+ CyanogenMod#2 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 task: ffff88000e222250 ti: ffff88000efd4000 task.ti: ffff88000efd4000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8144e944>] [<ffffffff8144e944>] blk_throtl_drain+0x84/0x230 RSP: 0018:ffff88000efd7bf0 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880015091450 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff88000efd7c10 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffff88000e222250 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880015091450 R13: ffff880015092e00 R14: ffff880015091d70 R15: ffff88001508fc28 FS: 00007f1332650740(0000) GS:ffff88001fa80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 0000000000000028 CR3: 0000000009446000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 Stack: ffffffff8144e8f6 ffff880015091450 0000000000000000 ffff880015091d80 ffff88000efd7c28 ffffffff8144ae2f ffff880015091450 ffff88000efd7c58 ffffffff81427641 ffff880015091450 ffffffff82401f00 ffff880015091450 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8144ae2f>] blkcg_drain_queue+0x1f/0x60 [<ffffffff81427641>] __blk_drain_queue+0x71/0x180 [<ffffffff81429b3e>] blk_queue_bypass_start+0x6e/0xb0 [<ffffffff814498b8>] blkcg_deactivate_policy+0x38/0x120 [<ffffffff8144ec44>] blk_throtl_exit+0x34/0x50 [<ffffffff8144aea5>] blkcg_exit_queue+0x35/0x40 [<ffffffff8142d476>] blk_release_queue+0x26/0xd0 [<ffffffff81454968>] kobject_cleanup+0x38/0x70 [<ffffffff81454848>] kobject_put+0x28/0x60 [<ffffffff81427505>] blk_put_queue+0x15/0x20 [<ffffffff817d07bb>] scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x16b/0x1c0 [<ffffffff810bc339>] execute_in_process_context+0x89/0xa0 [<ffffffff817d064c>] scsi_device_dev_release+0x1c/0x20 [<ffffffff817930e2>] device_release+0x32/0xa0 [<ffffffff81454968>] kobject_cleanup+0x38/0x70 [<ffffffff81454848>] kobject_put+0x28/0x60 [<ffffffff817934d7>] put_device+0x17/0x20 [<ffffffff817d11b9>] __scsi_remove_device+0xa9/0xe0 [<ffffffff817d121b>] scsi_remove_device+0x2b/0x40 [<ffffffff817d1257>] sdev_store_delete+0x27/0x30 [<ffffffff81792ca8>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30 [<ffffffff8126f75e>] sysfs_kf_write+0x3e/0x50 [<ffffffff8126ea87>] kernfs_fop_write+0xe7/0x170 [<ffffffff811f5e9f>] vfs_write+0xaf/0x1d0 [<ffffffff811f69bd>] SyS_write+0x4d/0xc0 [<ffffffff81d24692>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b 776687bce42b ("block, blk-mq: draining can't be skipped even if bypass_depth was non-zero") made it easier to trigger this bug by making blk_queue_bypass_start() drain even when it loses the first bypass test to blk_cleanup_queue(); however, the bug has always been there even before the commit as blk_queue_bypass_start() could race against queue destruction, win the initial bypass test but perform the actual draining after blk_cleanup_queue() already destroyed all blkgs. Fix it by skippping calling into policy draining if all the blkgs are already gone. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reported-by: Shirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Reported-by: Jet Chen <jet.chen@intel.com> Tested-by: Shirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
crpalmer
pushed a commit
to crpalmer/android_kernel_asus_moorefield
that referenced
this issue
Feb 8, 2016
commit 20defcec264ceab2630356fb9d397f3d237b5e6d upstream in 3.2-stable
Steven Rostedt reported:
> Porting -rt to the latest 3.2 stable tree I triggered this bug:
>
> =====================================
> [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
> -------------------------------------
> rm/1638 is trying to release lock (rcu_read_lock) at:
> [<c04fde6c>] rcu_read_unlock+0x0/0x23
> but there are no more locks to release!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 2 locks held by rm/1638:
> #0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<c04f93eb>] do_rmdir+0x5f/0xd2
> CyanogenMod#1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9){+.+.+.}, at: [<c04f9329>] vfs_rmdir+0x49/0xac
>
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 1638, comm: rm Not tainted 3.2.66-test-rt96+ CyanogenMod#2
> Call Trace:
> [<c083f390>] ? printk+0x1d/0x1f
> [<c0463cdf>] print_unlock_inbalance_bug+0xc3/0xcd
> [<c04653a8>] lock_release_non_nested+0x98/0x1ec
> [<c046228d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x18/0x90
> [<c0456f1c>] ? local_clock+0x2d/0x50
> [<c04fde6c>] ? d_hash+0x2f/0x2f
> [<c04fde6c>] ? d_hash+0x2f/0x2f
> [<c046568e>] lock_release+0x192/0x1ad
> [<c04fde83>] rcu_read_unlock+0x17/0x23
> [<c04ff344>] shrink_dcache_parent+0x227/0x270
> [<c04f9348>] vfs_rmdir+0x68/0xac
> [<c04f9424>] do_rmdir+0x98/0xd2
> [<c04f03ad>] ? fput+0x1a3/0x1ab
> [<c084dd42>] ? sysenter_exit+0xf/0x1a
> [<c0465b58>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x118/0x149
> [<c04fa3e0>] sys_unlinkat+0x2b/0x35
> [<c084dd13>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x12
>
>
>
>
> There's a path to calling rcu_read_unlock() without calling
> rcu_read_lock() in have_submounts().
>
> goto positive;
>
> positive:
> if (!locked && read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))
> goto rename_retry;
>
> rename_retry:
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> in the above path, rcu_read_lock() is never done before calling
> rcu_read_unlock();
I reviewed locking contexts in all three functions that I changed when
backporting "deal with deadlock in d_walk()". It's actually worse
than this:
- We don't hold this_parent->d_lock at the 'positive' label in
have_submounts(), but it is unlocked after 'rename_retry'.
- There is an rcu_read_unlock() after the 'out' label in
select_parent(), but it's not held at the 'goto out'.
Fix all three lock imbalances.
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
crpalmer
pushed a commit
to crpalmer/android_kernel_asus_moorefield
that referenced
this issue
Feb 8, 2016
commit 75a6f82a0d10ef8f13cd8fe7212911a0252ab99e upstream.
Normally opening a file, unlinking it and then closing will have
the inode freed upon close() (provided that it's not otherwise busy and
has no remaining links, of course). However, there's one case where that
does *not* happen. Namely, if you open it by fhandle with cold dcache,
then unlink() and close().
In normal case you get d_delete() in unlink(2) notice that dentry
is busy and unhash it; on the final dput() it will be forcibly evicted from
dcache, triggering iput() and inode removal. In this case, though, we end
up with *two* dentries - disconnected (created by open-by-fhandle) and
regular one (used by unlink()). The latter will have its reference to inode
dropped just fine, but the former will not - it's considered hashed (it
is on the ->s_anon list), so it will stay around until the memory pressure
will finally do it in. As the result, we have the final iput() delayed
indefinitely. It's trivial to reproduce -
void flush_dcache(void)
{
system("mount -o remount,rw /");
}
static char buf[20 * 1024 * 1024];
main()
{
int fd;
union {
struct file_handle f;
char buf[MAX_HANDLE_SZ];
} x;
int m;
x.f.handle_bytes = sizeof(x);
chdir("/root");
mkdir("foo", 0700);
fd = open("foo/bar", O_CREAT | O_RDWR, 0600);
close(fd);
name_to_handle_at(AT_FDCWD, "foo/bar", &x.f, &m, 0);
flush_dcache();
fd = open_by_handle_at(AT_FDCWD, &x.f, O_RDWR);
unlink("foo/bar");
write(fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
system("df ."); /* 20Mb eaten */
close(fd);
system("df ."); /* should've freed those 20Mb */
flush_dcache();
system("df ."); /* should be the same as CyanogenMod#2 */
}
will spit out something like
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/root 322023 303843 1131 100% /
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/root 322023 303843 1131 100% /
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/root 322023 283282 21692 93% /
- inode gets freed only when dentry is finally evicted (here we trigger
than by remount; normally it would've happened in response to memory
pressure hell knows when).
Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
crpalmer
pushed a commit
to crpalmer/android_kernel_asus_moorefield
that referenced
this issue
Feb 8, 2016
commit ecf5fc6e9654cd7a268c782a523f072b2f1959f9 upstream. Nikolay has reported a hang when a memcg reclaim got stuck with the following backtrace: PID: 18308 TASK: ffff883d7c9b0a30 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "rsync" #0 __schedule at ffffffff815ab152 CyanogenMod#1 schedule at ffffffff815ab76e CyanogenMod#2 schedule_timeout at ffffffff815ae5e5 CyanogenMod#3 io_schedule_timeout at ffffffff815aad6a CyanogenMod#4 bit_wait_io at ffffffff815abfc6 CyanogenMod#5 __wait_on_bit at ffffffff815abda5 CyanogenMod#6 wait_on_page_bit at ffffffff8111fd4f CyanogenMod#7 shrink_page_list at ffffffff81135445 #8 shrink_inactive_list at ffffffff81135845 #9 shrink_lruvec at ffffffff81135ead #10 shrink_zone at ffffffff811360c3 #11 shrink_zones at ffffffff81136eff #12 do_try_to_free_pages at ffffffff8113712f #13 try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages at ffffffff811372be #14 try_charge at ffffffff81189423 #15 mem_cgroup_try_charge at ffffffff8118c6f5 #16 __add_to_page_cache_locked at ffffffff8112137d #17 add_to_page_cache_lru at ffffffff81121618 #18 pagecache_get_page at ffffffff8112170b #19 grow_dev_page at ffffffff811c8297 #20 __getblk_slow at ffffffff811c91d6 #21 __getblk_gfp at ffffffff811c92c1 #22 ext4_ext_grow_indepth at ffffffff8124565c #23 ext4_ext_create_new_leaf at ffffffff81246ca8 #24 ext4_ext_insert_extent at ffffffff81246f09 #25 ext4_ext_map_blocks at ffffffff8124a848 #26 ext4_map_blocks at ffffffff8121a5b7 #27 mpage_map_one_extent at ffffffff8121b1fa #28 mpage_map_and_submit_extent at ffffffff8121f07b #29 ext4_writepages at ffffffff8121f6d5 #30 do_writepages at ffffffff8112c490 #31 __filemap_fdatawrite_range at ffffffff81120199 #32 filemap_flush at ffffffff8112041c #33 ext4_alloc_da_blocks at ffffffff81219da1 #34 ext4_rename at ffffffff81229b91 #35 ext4_rename2 at ffffffff81229e32 #36 vfs_rename at ffffffff811a08a5 #37 SYSC_renameat2 at ffffffff811a3ffc #38 sys_renameat2 at ffffffff811a408e #39 sys_rename at ffffffff8119e51e #40 system_call_fastpath at ffffffff815afa89 Dave Chinner has properly pointed out that this is a deadlock in the reclaim code because ext4 doesn't submit pages which are marked by PG_writeback right away. The heuristic was introduced by commit e62e384 ("memcg: prevent OOM with too many dirty pages") and it was applied only when may_enter_fs was specified. The code has been changed by c3b94f4 ("memcg: further prevent OOM with too many dirty pages") which has removed the __GFP_FS restriction with a reasoning that we do not get into the fs code. But this is not sufficient apparently because the fs doesn't necessarily submit pages marked PG_writeback for IO right away. ext4_bio_write_page calls io_submit_add_bh but that doesn't necessarily submit the bio. Instead it tries to map more pages into the bio and mpage_map_one_extent might trigger memcg charge which might end up waiting on a page which is marked PG_writeback but hasn't been submitted yet so we would end up waiting for something that never finishes. Fix this issue by replacing __GFP_IO by may_enter_fs check (for case 2) before we go to wait on the writeback. The page fault path, which is the only path that triggers memcg oom killer since 3.12, shouldn't require GFP_NOFS and so we shouldn't reintroduce the premature OOM killer issue which was originally addressed by the heuristic. As per David Chinner the xfs is doing similar thing since 2.6.15 already so ext4 is not the only affected filesystem. Moreover he notes: : For example: IO completion might require unwritten extent conversion : which executes filesystem transactions and GFP_NOFS allocations. The : writeback flag on the pages can not be cleared until unwritten : extent conversion completes. Hence memory reclaim cannot wait on : page writeback to complete in GFP_NOFS context because it is not : safe to do so, memcg reclaim or otherwise. [tytso@mit.edu: corrected the control flow] Fixes: c3b94f4 ("memcg: further prevent OOM with too many dirty pages") Reported-by: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
blkredstarV
pushed a commit
to blkredstarV/ZF2_kernel
that referenced
this issue
Jun 29, 2016
commit b49b927f16acee626c56a1af4ab4cb062f75b5df upstream.
We shouldn't be calling clk_prepare_enable()/clk_prepare_disable()
in an atomic context.
Fixes the following issue:
[ 5.830970] ehci-omap: OMAP-EHCI Host Controller driver
[ 5.830974] driver_register 'ehci-omap'
[ 5.895849] driver_register 'wl1271_sdio'
[ 5.896870] BUG: scheduling while atomic: udevd/994/0x00000002
[ 5.896876] 4 locks held by udevd/994:
[ 5.896904] #0: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c049597c>] __driver_attach+0x60/0xac
[ 5.896923] CyanogenMod#1: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c049598c>] __driver_attach+0x70/0xac
[ 5.896946] CyanogenMod#2: (tll_lock){+.+...}, at: [<c04c2630>] omap_tll_enable+0x2c/0xd0
[ 5.896966] CyanogenMod#3: (prepare_lock){+.+...}, at: [<c05ce9c8>] clk_prepare_lock+0x48/0xe0
[ 5.897042] Modules linked in: wlcore_sdio(+) ehci_omap(+) dwc3_omap snd_soc_ts3a225e leds_is31fl319x bq27xxx_battery_i2c tsc2007 bq27xxx_battery bq2429x_charger ina2xx tca8418_keypad as5013 leds_tca6507 twl6040_vibra gpio_twl6040 bmp085_i2c(+) palmas_gpadc usb3503 palmas_pwrbutton bmg160_i2c(+) bmp085 bma150(+) bmg160_core bmp280 input_polldev snd_soc_omap_mcbsp snd_soc_omap_mcpdm snd_soc_omap snd_pcm_dmaengine
[ 5.897048] Preemption disabled at:[< (null)>] (null)
[ 5.897051]
[ 5.897059] CPU: 0 PID: 994 Comm: udevd Not tainted 4.6.0-rc5-letux+ #233
[ 5.897062] Hardware name: Generic OMAP5 (Flattened Device Tree)
[ 5.897076] [<c010e714>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010af34>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[ 5.897087] [<c010af34>] (show_stack) from [<c040aa7c>] (dump_stack+0x88/0xc0)
[ 5.897099] [<c040aa7c>] (dump_stack) from [<c020c558>] (__schedule_bug+0xac/0xd0)
[ 5.897111] [<c020c558>] (__schedule_bug) from [<c06f3d44>] (__schedule+0x88/0x7e4)
[ 5.897120] [<c06f3d44>] (__schedule) from [<c06f46d8>] (schedule+0x9c/0xc0)
[ 5.897129] [<c06f46d8>] (schedule) from [<c06f4904>] (schedule_preempt_disabled+0x14/0x20)
[ 5.897140] [<c06f4904>] (schedule_preempt_disabled) from [<c06f64e4>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x258/0x43c)
[ 5.897150] [<c06f64e4>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c05ce9c8>] (clk_prepare_lock+0x48/0xe0)
[ 5.897160] [<c05ce9c8>] (clk_prepare_lock) from [<c05d0e7c>] (clk_prepare+0x10/0x28)
[ 5.897169] [<c05d0e7c>] (clk_prepare) from [<c04c2668>] (omap_tll_enable+0x64/0xd0)
[ 5.897180] [<c04c2668>] (omap_tll_enable) from [<c04c1728>] (usbhs_runtime_resume+0x18/0x17c)
[ 5.897192] [<c04c1728>] (usbhs_runtime_resume) from [<c049d404>] (pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x40)
[ 5.897202] [<c049d404>] (pm_generic_runtime_resume) from [<c049f180>] (__rpm_callback+0x38/0x68)
[ 5.897210] [<c049f180>] (__rpm_callback) from [<c049f220>] (rpm_callback+0x70/0x88)
[ 5.897218] [<c049f220>] (rpm_callback) from [<c04a0a00>] (rpm_resume+0x4ec/0x7ec)
[ 5.897227] [<c04a0a00>] (rpm_resume) from [<c04a0f48>] (__pm_runtime_resume+0x4c/0x64)
[ 5.897236] [<c04a0f48>] (__pm_runtime_resume) from [<c04958dc>] (driver_probe_device+0x30/0x70)
[ 5.897246] [<c04958dc>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c04959a4>] (__driver_attach+0x88/0xac)
[ 5.897256] [<c04959a4>] (__driver_attach) from [<c04940f8>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x50/0x84)
[ 5.897267] [<c04940f8>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c0494e40>] (bus_add_driver+0xcc/0x1e4)
[ 5.897276] [<c0494e40>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c0496914>] (driver_register+0xac/0xf4)
[ 5.897286] [<c0496914>] (driver_register) from [<c01018e0>] (do_one_initcall+0x100/0x1b8)
[ 5.897296] [<c01018e0>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c01c7a54>] (do_init_module+0x58/0x1c0)
[ 5.897304] [<c01c7a54>] (do_init_module) from [<c01c8a3c>] (SyS_finit_module+0x88/0x90)
[ 5.897313] [<c01c8a3c>] (SyS_finit_module) from [<c0107120>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c)
[ 5.912697] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 5.912711] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 994 at kernel/sched/core.c:2996 _raw_spin_unlock+0x28/0x58
[ 5.912717] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(val > preempt_count())
Reported-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com>
Tested-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I've been using the build provided on the forum and I'm running it for 3-4 days now.
Everyday I get a notification where the sim network auto selection failed and I have to search and manually select my network.
Please forgive if this is a known issue or not the right channel to submit issues.
Kudos for your work on this ROM!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: