You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
I have not understood this fully. I have a setup where I compare a calculation with a pure coffea processor to a ServiceX processor, which receives data through a func_adl query. I am cutting on jet.pt. When a column with name jet_pt_uncorr is fed into the processor in addition, it seems to interfere with the jet.pt cut. I am not sure what ends up happening to that column, it is neither events.jet.pt_uncorr nor events.jet.pt.uncorr in the processor.
When commenting out jet_pt_uncorr": e.jet_pt_uncorr (which is not used in the processor):
after filter 36673
With USE_SERVICEX = False at the top (no ServiceX used):
after filter 36673
Expected behavior
I have not manually verified the expected count, but suspect that 36673 is correct. I see the potential ambiguity of interpreting the _ in pt_uncorr, but would expect the presence of this column to not interfere with jet.pt.
Output
see above
Desktop (please complete the following information):
coffea 0.7.14, UNL open data coffea-casa / UChicago coffea-casa
Additional context
n/a
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
I have not understood this fully. I have a setup where I compare a calculation with a pure coffea processor to a ServiceX processor, which receives data through a func_adl query. I am cutting on
jet.pt
. When a column with namejet_pt_uncorr
is fed into the processor in addition, it seems to interfere with thejet.pt
cut. I am not sure what ends up happening to that column, it is neitherevents.jet.pt_uncorr
norevents.jet.pt.uncorr
in the processor.cc @gordonwatts
To Reproduce
See https://gist.github.com/alexander-held/7a3f3e001bca54342bfa93040bdf428a.
By default, feeding all columns to the processor:
When commenting out
jet_pt_uncorr": e.jet_pt_uncorr
(which is not used in the processor):With
USE_SERVICEX = False
at the top (no ServiceX used):Expected behavior
I have not manually verified the expected count, but suspect that
36673
is correct. I see the potential ambiguity of interpreting the_
inpt_uncorr
, but would expect the presence of this column to not interfere withjet.pt
.Output
see above
Desktop (please complete the following information):
coffea
0.7.14, UNL open data coffea-casa / UChicago coffea-casaAdditional context
n/a
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: