Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change "Copyright" footer #15

Open
tomschenkjr opened this issue Sep 28, 2014 · 5 comments
Open

Change "Copyright" footer #15

tomschenkjr opened this issue Sep 28, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@tomschenkjr
Copy link
Contributor

Need to change it from "Tom Schenk and Jonathan Levy" to "City of Chicago and contributors"

@rgroves
Copy link

rgroves commented Jul 17, 2015

It looks like this is controlled by the copyright variable in the file open-data-etl-utility-kit/docs/conf.py.

Currently it is set to '2014, City of Chicago'. Is it correct that this would just need to be updated to 'City of Chicago and contributors' (maybe with the current year prepended) and then one would need to perform a Sphinx rebuild of the docs?

@tomschenkjr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, that's right. It's a fairly easy fix but keeps getting placed at the bottom of the to-do list.

@rgroves
Copy link

rgroves commented Jul 18, 2015

I will attempt to pick this one up. Used Sphinx once about 4 years ago so will need to get it setup and re-familiarize myself with it in order to do the doc gen. Sounds like this one shouldn't be too difficult.

@rgroves
Copy link

rgroves commented Jul 19, 2015

I cloned the repository locally, updated conf.py and rebuilt the html docs, but I noticed the change set had more changes than I expected it to. It looks like the files in the docs directory have been modified since the last time the Sphinx built html documentation was committed.

Would you prefer to do an interim commit of the rebuilt documentation based on the docs current state. Then I'll update the copyright info, rebuild and check in that as a separate commit to keep the commits relevant to the changes that were made in them?

@tomschenkjr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @rgroves -- sorry for completely borking this thread!

To the extent you have time to be engaged: that suggestion makes sense. I've been reconciling a few things on this project and then that tees everything up nicely for the next "release".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants