[Feature Request] - Add granularity to Console Permissions

[seanmancini]

Lets add the ability for a non admin user to access the console and view devices but not alter any of the device details

user should be able to view the devices page and be able to check the status of said device

[netniV]

Sounds like a reasonable request. This will go as a minimum 1.3 item.

[xmacan]

@seanmancini you need only devices or more things from console? If you need only display hosts, easy way is make the same thing like clog for admin and normal users - no console menu, only new tab "Devices" with list of your devices and read-only device detail.
@netniV , @TheWitness What doy you think?

[bmfmancini]

Yea that was my thinking

…

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:59 AM Petr Macek ***@***.***> wrote: @seanmancini <https://github.com/seanmancini> you need only devices or more things from console? If you need only display hosts, easy way is make the same thing like clog for admin and normal users - no console menu, only new tab "Devices" with list of your devices and read-only device detail. @netniV <https://github.com/netniV> , @TheWitness <https://github.com/TheWitness> What doy you think? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5526 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADGEXTFERPSSXBPKGQAAI3LYV5H7RAVCNFSM6AAAAAA52PGU2SVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNRZGI4TONZYGY> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- Thank you Sean Mancini,(Six Sigma LBBIT®, ITIL,CEA-IT®,SCRUM SMPC®) Owner/Principal Engineer www.seanmancini.com “Companies spend millions of dollars on firewalls, encryption, and secure access devices, and it’s money wasted because none of these measures address the weakest link in the security chain.” *– Kevin Mitnick*

[TheWitness]

It can be done based upon permissions for sure. Been super busy these days.