Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AssignBondOrderProcessor_test fails OS dependent #576

Open
philthiel opened this issue Mar 31, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

AssignBondOrderProcessor_test fails OS dependent #576

philthiel opened this issue Mar 31, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@philthiel
Copy link
Contributor

The test fails on OSX >= 10.10 (Xcode7, clang) in line 1856:
CHECK(Option::USE_FINE_PENALTY).

Attempts to track the problem down pointed out that for the structure used in this subtest
(AssignBondOrderProcessor_test_AMPTRB10_kek_sol0.mol2),
USE_FINE_PENALTY=true yields the same results on all systems, however,
setting USE_FINE_PENALTY=false yields different results on Linux and OSX.

I attached a small TOOL snippet that can be used to reproduce the problem:
BOA_test.C.zip
The molecule file is located in <BALL_root>/source/TEST/data/

@philthiel philthiel added the bug label Mar 31, 2016
philthiel added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2017
Reset of AssignBondOrderProcessor_test2 (former AssignBondOrderProcessor_test)
to parent of commit 0eb2ae8.
The two follow up commits doesn't help to solve the errors described in issue #576
and introduced even more failing subtests that probably haven't been tested properly.
tkemmer pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 16, 2017
Reset of AssignBondOrderProcessor_test2 (former AssignBondOrderProcessor_test)
to parent of commit 0eb2ae8.
The two follow up commits doesn't help to solve the errors described in issue #576
and introduced even more failing subtests that probably haven't been tested properly.
@tkemmer tkemmer added T: defect and removed bug labels Mar 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants