Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unable to compile lavam programs correctly #121

Open
spencerwuwu opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Unable to compile lavam programs correctly #121

spencerwuwu opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@spencerwuwu
Copy link

Hello Angora authors,

I'm trying to reproduce the lavam evaluation within Magma's infrastructure. However, I think I encounter the following 2 issues. Could you help me to check if I'm doing anything wrong?

Thank you in advance!

The 2 issues are as follow:

  1. Angora cannot find any bugs while AFLplusplus can easily discover ones within a few minutes. From the log files I see that Angora is saying Multiple inconsistent warnings. It caused by the fast and track programs has different behaviors. If most constraints are inconsistent, ensure they are compiled with the same environment. Otherwise, please report us.
  2. For who, AFLplusplus can only find <20 bugs after running for 5 hours. For other targets it is finding the numbers of bugs reported in your paper.

You can find the scripts I use to compile and run the fuzzing campaigns here.
Basically, the lavam programs are compiled with fuzzers/aflplusplus/instrument.sh and fuzzers/angora/instrument.sh, which they set up some config and execute targets/lavam/build.sh.
In targets/lavam/LAVAM you can find the patched source code following your instructions.

To launch the fuzzing campaigns, cd into tools/captain and run ./run.sh run_lavamrc.
run_lavamrc is the config file for the campaign. It would create a working directory in ~/lavam-results, build docker containers and start fuzzing with fuzzers/aflplusplus/run.sh and fuzzers/angora/run.sh. The fuzzing results are stored in ~/lavam-results/ar as tarballs.

Please do let me know if you need any additional information.

Spencer

@spencerwuwu
Copy link
Author

The issue related to 'who' can be ignored as I missed to patch the source code correctly.
The issue of Angora still exists.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant