Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: modular shell interface #32

Open
jwpjrdev opened this issue Jan 11, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Feature request: modular shell interface #32

jwpjrdev opened this issue Jan 11, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@jwpjrdev
Copy link
Contributor

The current shell is pretty basic and could do with an overhaul. A registry of some form along with installation might be in order.
Using something like nushell would remove a lot of the current boilerplate shell code.

I wouldn't mind helping out since this is something I can wrap my mind head around 😅

@48cf
Copy link
Collaborator

48cf commented Jan 11, 2022

The issue we are currently facing with using an already existing shell is that most of them use system calls/features that aren't implemented in aero just yet. Once we start to implement more and more system calls then we will be able to let users choose a different shell than aero_shell, for example bash which already has a non-functional port.

@jwpjrdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

I see. I'll keep an eye out for that!

@Andy-Python-Programmer Andy-Python-Programmer added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers labels Jan 11, 2022
@Andy-Python-Programmer
Copy link
Owner

Andy-Python-Programmer commented Jan 12, 2022

Good news, we just finished porting the rust compiler today and now it can compile for the x86_64-unknown-aero target :^) Now we can try to port nushell. Sweet!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants