Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test accuracy is not similar with the paper #5

Open
willyfh opened this issue Apr 20, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Test accuracy is not similar with the paper #5

willyfh opened this issue Apr 20, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@willyfh
Copy link

willyfh commented Apr 20, 2021

Following are the results of my execution using your code (no modification in the hyperparameter and model):

model at 40 epoch,
(train) bin_accuracy: 0.9577
val_bin_accuracy: 0.9514
test_accuracy : 0.5724729895591736

model at 37 epoch (best model based on val set),
(train) bin_accuracy: 0.9568
val_bin_accuracy: 0.9820
test_accuracy : 0.6100730895996094
confusion matrix:
[[ 814. 2666.]
[ 694. 4443.]]

train and validation accuracy is actually similar enough, but the test accuracy is quite far from the paper.

@willyfh willyfh closed this as completed Apr 20, 2021
@willyfh willyfh reopened this Apr 21, 2021
@AlirezaShamsoshoara
Copy link
Owner

It shouldn't be like this. I will check it and I will let you know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants