Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Using Implicit Solvers #203

Open
jpfairbanks opened this issue Feb 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Using Implicit Solvers #203

jpfairbanks opened this issue Feb 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
@quffaro
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jpfairbanks
Copy link
Member

@lukem12345, @GeorgeR227, when Chris R. got the autodiff working for implicit solvers, we tested some of our stiffer problems with those solvers. But when I checked the tests and examples just now. I only saw Tsit5(). Can we use other solvers?
@lukem12345
Copy link
Member

Yes. For FEED I have gotten good results from the FBDF and Trapezoid solvers.

@lukem12345
Copy link
Member

Maybe the Klausmeier model could benefit from a non-explicit solver.

@jpfairbanks
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, so let's make sure to update the docs so that they are using one of the implicit solvers https://docs.sciml.ai/DiffEqDocs/stable/solvers/ode_solve/#Stiff-Problems

@quffaro quffaro self-assigned this Mar 6, 2024
@quffaro quffaro added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@quffaro quffaro

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jpfairbanks @quffaro @lukem12345