You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Current behavior:
The switch “Fastest IP address“ makes AdGuard query all configured upstreams. Then…
if the upstreams return an A or AAAA record type, then AdGuard measures the time to open up a TCP connection to ports 80 and 443 of all returned IP addresses of all configured upstreams. AdGuard then return a manipulated DNS record, that only contains the fastest IP address.
else (i.e. the upstreams return a different record type) AdGuard enters the normal “load-balancing“ mode. (see
Suggested behavior:
If the upstreams return a different record type than A or AAAA, then AdGuard enters the normal “Parallel requests“ mode, i.e. change line 28 to “return upstream.ExchangeParallel(ups, req)“ (like in
Rationale:
As a user of “Fastest IP address“ I have to accept that generally all upstreams are queried in order to get the best overall system performance. In the case of A/AAAA records that is the fastest content server (not the fastest DNS answer). In case of other record types, that would be the fastest DNS answer, in my opinion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Current behavior:
The switch “Fastest IP address“ makes AdGuard query all configured upstreams. Then…
dnsproxy/proxy/exchange.go
Line 28 in a87a3df
Suggested behavior:
If the upstreams return a different record type than A or AAAA, then AdGuard enters the normal “Parallel requests“ mode, i.e. change line 28 to “return upstream.ExchangeParallel(ups, req)“ (like in
dnsproxy/proxy/exchange.go
Line 22 in a87a3df
Rationale:
As a user of “Fastest IP address“ I have to accept that generally all upstreams are queried in order to get the best overall system performance. In the case of A/AAAA records that is the fastest content server (not the fastest DNS answer). In case of other record types, that would be the fastest DNS answer, in my opinion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: