Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] Add EasyPrivacy CNAME filters #1676

Open
3 tasks done
metametapod opened this issue Apr 27, 2024 · 4 comments
Open
3 tasks done

[Request] Add EasyPrivacy CNAME filters #1676

metametapod opened this issue Apr 27, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
Feature Request New feature or request

Comments

@metametapod
Copy link

metametapod commented Apr 27, 2024

Prerequisites

  • I checked the documentation and found no answer;
  • I checked to make sure that this issue has not already been filed;
  • This is not an ad/bug report.

Problem description

For example:

There are several notable omissions without it, e.g. Comcast/Xfinity, Spectrum, AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Equifax, Experian, TransUnion.

Proposed solution

Add easyprivacy_specific_cname_*.txt files/hostnames to the AdGuard DNS filter.

Additional information

No response

@metametapod metametapod added the Feature Request New feature or request label Apr 27, 2024
@Alex-302
Copy link
Member

They are AdGuard's, included to Easylist:) (after some processing)

@metametapod
Copy link
Author

Oh I see:

https://github.com/AdguardTeam/cname-trackers/tree/master/data/trackers

Should these be included in the AdGuard DNS filter as well?

@Alex-302
Copy link
Member

Alex-302 commented May 2, 2024

Yes, some CNAME lists must be included. We will check it.

@jellizaveta
Copy link
Contributor

DNS can find CNAME records, there is no need to include CNAME. Some Adobe Experience Cloud, Branch.io and Oracle Eloqua domains are intentionally excluded from DNS blocking because they cause a lot of breakage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature Request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants