New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Slow cached responses #6904
Comments
Hi @Dynamic5912, thanks for the report. With both AdGuard Web Security and Parental Control services enabled, most queries are still being served from cache. Enabling or disabling those two settings is having no impact on my setup. Could you please provide the following: |
Hi, They are being served from Cache as you can see by the Green Tick. But the process times are high. |
I understand. Without the information requested in my previous comment, I can't do much to reproduce the issue, let alone get it resolved though. |
What DNS servers were you testing with? I think the issue only exhibits itself if using Unbound and going to the Root DNS servers. |
It doesn't matter, he is using root servers with his local unbound instance. I don't have those issues, with the same setup. @Dynamic5912 Do not use Adguard caching system if you use unbound! |
Prerequisites
I have checked the Wiki and Discussions and found no answer
I have searched other issues and found no duplicates
I want to report a bug and not ask a question or ask for help
I have set up AdGuard Home correctly and configured clients to use it. (Use the Discussions for help with installing and configuring clients.)
Platform (OS and CPU architecture)
Linux, AMD64 (aka x86_64)
Installation
GitHub releases or script from README
Setup
On one machine
AdGuard Home version
Latest
Action
N/A
Expected result
Lower MS response times when served from cached
Actual result
With reference to original Issue 5842 - #5842
Cached DNS replies have high MS response times when using AdGuard Web Security and Parental Control services.
Additional information and/or screenshots
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: