Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SUGGESTION] Cost and generation system #304

Open
PolySteam opened this issue Jul 1, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

[SUGGESTION] Cost and generation system #304

PolySteam opened this issue Jul 1, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@PolySteam
Copy link
Contributor

Balancing in ACF-3 currently is less than ideal, nothing stops you from stacking guns atop your vehicle and using them as weight efficient armor as an example, with autoloader cannons being the worst offender.

With a cost system and generation system it would be possible to balance things more properly instead of having everything be relatively similar in effectiveness. There is currently zero reason not to use a radar, stack missiles or spam guns. All you're losing with is an insignificant amount of added weight.

APHE is superior to AP entirely.
APFSDS is inferior to HEATFS in practical use.
HEAT/FS is entirely superior to HE as it has an added capability against armor along with the HE blast.

All of these could be fixed with a cost system.
Relying on weight to balance things alone is futile and has been proven time and time again to not be sufficient enough.

@PolySteam PolySteam added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant