-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
/
references.bib
140 lines (134 loc) · 7.3 KB
/
references.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
@ARTICLE{Bi2020,
title = "Configuration and spin-up of {ACCESS-CM2}, the new generation
{Australian Community Climate} and {Earth System Simulator} coupled
Model",
author = "Bi, Daohua and Dix, Martin and Marsland, Simon and O'Farrell,
Siobhan and Sullivan, Arnold and Bodman, Roger and Law, Rachel
and Harman, Ian and Srbinovsky, Jhan and Rashid, Harun A and
Dobrohotoff, Peter and Mackallah, Chloe and Yan, Hailin and
Hirst, Anthony and Savita, Abhishek and Dias, Fabio Boeira and
Woodhouse, Matthew and Fiedler, Russell and Heerdegen, Aidan",
abstract = "A new version of the Australian Community Climate and Earth
System Simulator coupled model, ACCESS-CM2, has been developed
for a wide range of climate modelling research and applications.
In particular, ACCESS-CM2 is one of Australia's contributions to
the World Climate Research Programme's Coupled Model
Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Compared with the
ACCESS1.3 model used for our CMIP5 submission, all model
components have been upgraded as well as the coupling framework
(OASIS3-MCT) and experiment control system (Rose/Cylc). The
component models are: UM10.6 GA7.1 for the atmosphere, CABLE2.5
for the land surface, MOM5 for the ocean, and CICE5.1.2 for the
sea ice. This paper describes the model configuration of
ACCESS-CM2, documents the experimental set up, and assesses the
model performance for the preindustrial spin-up simulation in
comparison against (reconstructed) observations and ACCESS1.3
results. While the performance of the two generations of the
ACCESS coupled model is largely comparable, ACCESS-CM2 shows
better global hydrological balance, more realistic ocean water
properties (in terms of spatial distribution) and meridional
overturning circulation in the Southern Ocean but a poorer
simulation of the Antarctic sea ice and a larger energy imbalance
at the top of atmosphere. This energy imbalance reflects a
noticeable warming trend of the global ocean over the spin-up
period.",
journal = "Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science",
volume = 70,
number = 1,
pages = "225--251",
year = 2020,
keywords = "Keywords: ACCESS-CM2, climate change, climate simulation, CMIP6,
coupled climate model, evaluation, greenhouse gases, physical
configuration, preindustrial spin-up, tuning and debugging.",
DOI = {10.1071/ES19040}
},
@ARTICLE{Ziehn2020,
title = "The {Australian Earth System Model}: {ACCESS-ESM1.5}",
author = "Ziehn, Tilo and Chamberlain, Matthew A and Law, Rachel M and
Lenton, Andrew and Bodman, Roger W and Dix, Martin and Stevens,
Lauren and Wang, Ying-Ping and Srbinovsky, Jhan",
abstract = "The Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator
(ACCESS) has been extended to include land and ocean carbon cycle
components to form an Earth System Model (ESM). The current
version, ACCESS-ESM1.5, has been mainly developed to enable
Australia to participate in the Coupled Model Intercomparison
Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) with an ESM version. Here we describe the
model components and changes to the previous version,
ACCESS-ESM1. We use the 500-year pre-industrial control run to
highlight the stability of the physical climate and the carbon
cycle. The long spin-up, negligible drift in temperature and
small pre-industrial net carbon fluxes (0.02 and 0.08 PgC year−1
for land and ocean respectively) highlight the suitability of
ACCESS-ESM1.5 to explore modes of variability in the climate
system and coupling to the carbon cycle. The physical climate and
carbon cycle for the present day have been evaluated using the
CMIP6 historical simulation by comparing against observations and
ACCESS-ESM1. Although there is generally little change in the
climate simulation from the earlier model, many aspects of the
carbon simulation are improved. An assessment of the climate
response to CO2 forcing indicates that ACCESS-ESM1.5 has an
equilibrium climate sensitivity of 3.87°C.",
journal = "Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science",
volume = 70,
number = 1,
pages = "193--214",
year = 2020,
keywords = "Keywords: ACCESS, biogeochemistry, CABLE, carbon cycle, climate
modelling, CMIP6, earth system modelling",
DOI = {10.1071/ES19035}
},
@Article{Kiss2020,
AUTHOR = {Kiss, A. E. and Hogg, A. McC. and Hannah, N. and Boeira Dias, F. and Brassington, G. B. and Chamberlain, M. A. and Chapman, C. and Dobrohotoff, P. and Domingues, C. M. and Duran, E. R. and England, M. H. and Fiedler, R. and Griffies, S. M. and Heerdegen, A. and Heil, P. and Holmes, R. M. and Klocker, A. and Marsland, S. J. and Morrison, A. K. and Munroe, J. and Nikurashin, M. and Oke, P. R. and Pilo, G. S. and Richet, O. and Savita, A. and Spence, P. and Stewart, K. D. and Ward, M. L. and Wu, F. and Zhang, X.},
TITLE = {{ACCESS-OM2 v1.0}: a global ocean--sea ice model at three resolutions},
JOURNAL = {Geoscientific Model Development},
VOLUME = {13},
YEAR = {2020},
NUMBER = {2},
PAGES = {401--442},
URL = {https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/13/401/2020/},
DOI = {10.5194/gmd-13-401-2020}
}
@article{Brady2021,
doi = {10.21105/joss.02781},
year = {2021},
publisher = {The Open Journal},
volume = {6},
number = {59},
pages = {2781},
author = {Riley X. Brady and Aaron Spring},
title = {climpred: {Verification} of weather and climate forecasts},
journal = {Journal of Open Source Software}
}
@article{Baker2017,
title={Overview of the model and observation evaluation Toolkit ({MONET}) version 1.0 for evaluating atmospheric transport models},
author={Baker, Barry and Pan, Li},
journal={Atmosphere},
volume={8},
number={11},
pages={210},
year={2017},
publisher={MDPI},
doi={10.3390/atmos8110210}
}
@article{Brown2021,
title={The {Model Evaluation Tools (MET)}: {More} than a decade of community-supported forecast verification},
author={Brown, Barbara and Jensen, Tara and Gotway, John Halley and Bullock, Randy and Gilleland, Eric and Fowler, Tressa and Newman, Kathryn and Adriaansen, Dan and Blank, Lindsay and Burek, Tatiana and others},
journal={Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society},
volume={102},
number={4},
pages={E782--E807},
year={2021},
doi={10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0093.1}
}
@article{Ukkola2017,
author = {Ukkola, A. M. and Haughton, N. and De Kauwe, M. G. and Abramowitz, G. and Pitman, A. J.},
title = {FluxnetLSM R package (v1.0): a community tool for processing FLUXNET data
for use in land surface modelling},
journal = {Geoscientific Model Development},
volume = {10},
year = {2017},
number = {9},
pages = {3379--3390},
url = {https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/10/3379/2017/},
doi = {10.5194/gmd-10-3379-2017}
}