linux-3.10.41_CVE-2014-3153.diff

From 6b4bd8bbe22527985c3898be6e2438329998115b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mancha <mancha1@zoho.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014
Subject: Privilege escalation / DoS (CVE-2014-3153)

This patch fixes an issue in the futex subsystem that allows a
local user to gain ring 0 control via the futex syscall. An
unprivileged user could use this flaw to crash the kernel (resulting
in denial of service) or for privilege escalation.

Discovered by: Pinkie Pie

Backported fix for use on 3.10.x based on Thomas Gleixner's patches:

  futex-add-another-early-deadlock-detection-check
  futex-prevent-attaching-to-kernel-threads
  futex-prevent-requeue-pi-on-same-futex
  futex-validate-atomic-acquisition-in-futex_lock_pi_atomic
  futex-always-cleanup-owner-tid-in-unlock_pi
  futex-make-lookup_pi_state-more-robust

---
 kernel/futex.c |  243 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 188 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -592,6 +592,55 @@ void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_stru
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
 }
 
+/*
+ * We need to check the following states:
+ *
+ *      Waiter | pi_state | pi->owner | uTID      | uODIED | ?
+ *
+ * [1]  NULL   | ---      | ---       | 0         | 0/1    | Valid
+ * [2]  NULL   | ---      | ---       | >0        | 0/1    | Valid
+ *
+ * [3]  Found  | NULL     | --        | Any       | 0/1    | Invalid
+ *
+ * [4]  Found  | Found    | NULL      | 0         | 1      | Valid
+ * [5]  Found  | Found    | NULL      | >0        | 1      | Invalid
+ *
+ * [6]  Found  | Found    | task      | 0         | 1      | Valid
+ *
+ * [7]  Found  | Found    | NULL      | Any       | 0      | Invalid
+ *
+ * [8]  Found  | Found    | task      | ==taskTID | 0/1    | Valid
+ * [9]  Found  | Found    | task      | 0         | 0      | Invalid
+ * [10] Found  | Found    | task      | !=taskTID | 0/1    | Invalid
+ *
+ * [1]	Indicates that the kernel can acquire the futex atomically. We
+ *	came came here due to a stale FUTEX_WAITERS/FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit.
+ *
+ * [2]	Valid, if TID does not belong to a kernel thread. If no matching
+ *      thread is found then it indicates that the owner TID has died.
+ *
+ * [3]	Invalid. The waiter is queued on a non PI futex
+ *
+ * [4]	Valid state after exit_robust_list(), which sets the user space
+ *	value to FUTEX_WAITERS | FUTEX_OWNER_DIED.
+ *
+ * [5]	The user space value got manipulated between exit_robust_list()
+ *	and exit_pi_state_list()
+ *
+ * [6]	Valid state after exit_pi_state_list() which sets the new owner in
+ *	the pi_state but cannot access the user space value.
+ *
+ * [7]	pi_state->owner can only be NULL when the OWNER_DIED bit is set.
+ *
+ * [8]	Owner and user space value match
+ *
+ * [9]	There is no transient state which sets the user space TID to 0
+ *	except exit_robust_list(), but this is indicated by the
+ *	FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit. See [4]
+ *
+ * [10] There is no transient state which leaves owner and user space
+ *	TID out of sync.
+ */
 static int
 lookup_pi_state(u32 uval, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
 		union futex_key *key, struct futex_pi_state **ps)
@@ -607,12 +656,13 @@ lookup_pi_state(u32 uval, struct futex_h
 	plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, head, list) {
 		if (match_futex(&this->key, key)) {
 			/*
-			 * Another waiter already exists - bump up
-			 * the refcount and return its pi_state:
+			 * Sanity check the waiter before increasing
+			 * the refcount and attaching to it.
 			 */
 			pi_state = this->pi_state;
 			/*
-			 * Userspace might have messed up non-PI and PI futexes
+			 * Userspace might have messed up non-PI and
+			 * PI futexes [3]
 			 */
 			if (unlikely(!pi_state))
 				return -EINVAL;
@@ -620,34 +670,70 @@ lookup_pi_state(u32 uval, struct futex_h
 			WARN_ON(!atomic_read(&pi_state->refcount));
 
 			/*
-			 * When pi_state->owner is NULL then the owner died
-			 * and another waiter is on the fly. pi_state->owner
-			 * is fixed up by the task which acquires
-			 * pi_state->rt_mutex.
-			 *
-			 * We do not check for pid == 0 which can happen when
-			 * the owner died and robust_list_exit() cleared the
-			 * TID.
+			 * Handle the owner died case:
 			 */
-			if (pid && pi_state->owner) {
+			if (uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) {
+				/*
+				 * exit_pi_state_list sets owner to NULL and
+				 * wakes the topmost waiter. The task which
+				 * acquires the pi_state->rt_mutex will fixup
+				 * owner.
+				 */
+				if (!pi_state->owner) {
+					/*
+					 * No pi state owner, but the user
+					 * space TID is not 0. Inconsistent
+					 * state. [5]
+					 */
+					if (pid)
+						return -EINVAL;
+					/*
+					 * Take a ref on the state and
+					 * return. [4]
+					 */
+					goto out_state;
+				}
+
 				/*
-				 * Bail out if user space manipulated the
-				 * futex value.
+				 * If TID is 0, then either the dying owner
+				 * has not yet executed exit_pi_state_list()
+				 * or some waiter acquired the rtmutex in the
+				 * pi state, but did not yet fixup the TID in
+				 * user space.
+				 *
+				 * Take a ref on the state and return. [6]
 				 */
-				if (pid != task_pid_vnr(pi_state->owner))
+				if (!pid)
+					goto out_state;
+			} else {
+				/*
+				 * If the owner died bit is not set,
+				 * then the pi_state must have an
+				 * owner. [7]
+				 */
+				if (!pi_state->owner)
 					return -EINVAL;
 			}
 
+			/*
+			 * Bail out if user space manipulated the
+			 * futex value. If pi state exists then the
+			 * owner TID must be the same as the user
+			 * space TID. [9/10]
+			 */
+			if (pid != task_pid_vnr(pi_state->owner))
+				return -EINVAL;
+
+		out_state:
 			atomic_inc(&pi_state->refcount);
 			*ps = pi_state;
-
 			return 0;
 		}
 	}
 
 	/*
 	 * We are the first waiter - try to look up the real owner and attach
-	 * the new pi_state to it, but bail out when TID = 0
+	 * the new pi_state to it, but bail out when TID = 0 [1]
 	 */
 	if (!pid)
 		return -ESRCH;
@@ -655,6 +741,11 @@ lookup_pi_state(u32 uval, struct futex_h
 	if (!p)
 		return -ESRCH;
 
+	if (!p->mm) {
+		put_task_struct(p);
+		return -EPERM;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * We need to look at the task state flags to figure out,
 	 * whether the task is exiting. To protect against the do_exit
@@ -675,6 +766,9 @@ lookup_pi_state(u32 uval, struct futex_h
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * No existing pi state. First waiter. [2]
+	 */
 	pi_state = alloc_pi_state();
 
 	/*
@@ -746,10 +840,18 @@ retry:
 		return -EDEADLK;
 
 	/*
-	 * Surprise - we got the lock. Just return to userspace:
+	 * Surprise - we got the lock, but we do not trust user space at all.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(!curval))
-		return 1;
+	if (unlikely(!curval)) {
+		/*
+		 * We verify whether there is kernel state for this
+		 * futex. If not, we can safely assume, that the 0 ->
+		 * TID transition is correct. If state exists, we do
+		 * not bother to fixup the user space state as it was
+		 * corrupted already.
+		 */
+		return futex_top_waiter(hb, key) ? -EINVAL : 1;
+	}
 
 	uval = curval;
 
@@ -879,6 +981,7 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uad
 	struct task_struct *new_owner;
 	struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = this->pi_state;
 	u32 uninitialized_var(curval), newval;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!pi_state)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -902,23 +1005,19 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uad
 		new_owner = this->task;
 
 	/*
-	 * We pass it to the next owner. (The WAITERS bit is always
-	 * kept enabled while there is PI state around. We must also
-	 * preserve the owner died bit.)
-	 */
-	if (!(uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED)) {
-		int ret = 0;
-
-		newval = FUTEX_WAITERS | task_pid_vnr(new_owner);
-
-		if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval))
-			ret = -EFAULT;
-		else if (curval != uval)
-			ret = -EINVAL;
-		if (ret) {
-			raw_spin_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
-			return ret;
-		}
+	 * We pass it to the next owner. The WAITERS bit is always
+	 * kept enabled while there is PI state around. We cleanup the
+	 * owner died bit, because we are the owner.
+	 */
+	newval = FUTEX_WAITERS | task_pid_vnr(new_owner);
+
+	if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, uaddr, uval, newval))
+		ret = -EFAULT;
+	else if (curval != uval)
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+	if (ret) {
+		raw_spin_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->owner->pi_lock);
@@ -1197,7 +1296,7 @@ void requeue_pi_wake_futex(struct futex_
  *
  * Return:
  *  0 - failed to acquire the lock atomically;
- *  1 - acquired the lock;
+ * >0 - acquired the lock, return value is vpid of the top_waiter
  * <0 - error
  */
 static int futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u32 __user *pifutex,
@@ -1208,7 +1307,7 @@ static int futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u3
 {
 	struct futex_q *top_waiter = NULL;
 	u32 curval;
-	int ret;
+	int ret, vpid;
 
 	if (get_futex_value_locked(&curval, pifutex))
 		return -EFAULT;
@@ -1236,11 +1335,13 @@ static int futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u3
 	 * the contended case or if set_waiters is 1.  The pi_state is returned
 	 * in ps in contended cases.
 	 */
+	vpid = task_pid_vnr(top_waiter->task);
 	ret = futex_lock_pi_atomic(pifutex, hb2, key2, ps, top_waiter->task,
 				   set_waiters);
-	if (ret == 1)
+	if (ret == 1) {
 		requeue_pi_wake_futex(top_waiter, key2, hb2);
-
+		return vpid;
+	}
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1272,10 +1373,16 @@ static int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uad
 	struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1, *hb2;
 	struct plist_head *head1;
 	struct futex_q *this, *next;
-	u32 curval2;
 
 	if (requeue_pi) {
 		/*
+		 * Requeue PI only works on two distinct uaddrs. This
+		 * check is only valid for private futexes. See below.
+		 */
+		if (uaddr1 == uaddr2)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		/*
 		 * requeue_pi requires a pi_state, try to allocate it now
 		 * without any locks in case it fails.
 		 */
@@ -1313,6 +1420,15 @@ retry:
 	if (unlikely(ret != 0))
 		goto out_put_key1;
 
+	/*
+	 * The check above which compares uaddrs is not sufficient for
+	 * shared futexes. We need to compare the keys:
+	 */
+	if (requeue_pi && match_futex(&key1, &key2)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_put_keys;
+	}
+
 	hb1 = hash_futex(&key1);
 	hb2 = hash_futex(&key2);
 
@@ -1358,16 +1474,25 @@ retry_private:
 		 * At this point the top_waiter has either taken uaddr2 or is
 		 * waiting on it.  If the former, then the pi_state will not
 		 * exist yet, look it up one more time to ensure we have a
-		 * reference to it.
+		 * reference to it. If the lock was taken, ret contains the
+		 * vpid of the top waiter task.
 		 */
-		if (ret == 1) {
+		if (ret > 0) {
 			WARN_ON(pi_state);
 			drop_count++;
 			task_count++;
-			ret = get_futex_value_locked(&curval2, uaddr2);
-			if (!ret)
-				ret = lookup_pi_state(curval2, hb2, &key2,
-						      &pi_state);
+			/*
+			 * If we acquired the lock, then the user
+			 * space value of uaddr2 should be vpid. It
+			 * cannot be changed by the top waiter as it
+			 * is blocked on hb2 lock if it tries to do
+			 * so. If something fiddled with it behind our
+			 * back the pi state lookup might unearth
+			 * it. So we rather use the known value than
+			 * rereading and handing potential crap to
+			 * lookup_pi_state.
+			 */
+			ret = lookup_pi_state(ret, hb2, &key2, &pi_state);
 		}
 
 		switch (ret) {
@@ -2137,9 +2262,10 @@ retry:
 	/*
 	 * To avoid races, try to do the TID -> 0 atomic transition
 	 * again. If it succeeds then we can return without waking
-	 * anyone else up:
+	 * anyone else up. We only try this if neither the waiters nor
+	 * the owner died bit are set.
 	 */
-	if (!(uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED) &&
+	if (!(uval & ~FUTEX_TID_MASK) &&
 	    cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&uval, uaddr, vpid, 0))
 		goto pi_faulted;
 	/*
@@ -2171,11 +2297,9 @@ retry:
 	/*
 	 * No waiters - kernel unlocks the futex:
 	 */
-	if (!(uval & FUTEX_OWNER_DIED)) {
-		ret = unlock_futex_pi(uaddr, uval);
-		if (ret == -EFAULT)
-			goto pi_faulted;
-	}
+	ret = unlock_futex_pi(uaddr, uval);
+	if (ret == -EFAULT)
+		goto pi_faulted;
 
 out_unlock:
 	spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
@@ -2334,6 +2458,15 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __u
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_key2;
 
+	/*
+	 * The check above which compares uaddrs is not sufficient for
+	 * shared futexes. We need to compare the keys:
+	 */
+	if (match_futex(&q.key, &key2)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_put_keys;
+	}
+
 	/* Queue the futex_q, drop the hb lock, wait for wakeup. */
 	futex_wait_queue_me(hb, &q, to);