Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How about to support openharmony target #20009

Closed
southorange0929 opened this issue May 20, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #20011
Closed

How about to support openharmony target #20009

southorange0929 opened this issue May 20, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #20011
Labels
enhancement Solving this issue will likely involve adding new logic or components to the codebase.
Milestone

Comments

@southorange0929
Copy link

southorange0929 commented May 20, 2024

Zig Version

0.12.0

Steps to Reproduce and Observed Behavior

support those commands:

zig build -Dtarget=aarch64-openhos 
# or
zig build -Dtarget=aarch64-linux-ohos

Expected Behavior

support target openharmony which is supported by llvm as openhos.

Or is there any guidance available for adaptation? Thanks

@southorange0929 southorange0929 added the bug Observed behavior contradicts documented or intended behavior label May 20, 2024
@southorange0929 southorange0929 changed the title Support openharmony target How about to support openharmony target May 20, 2024
@Vexu Vexu added enhancement Solving this issue will likely involve adding new logic or components to the codebase. standard library This issue involves writing Zig code for the standard library. and removed bug Observed behavior contradicts documented or intended behavior labels May 20, 2024
@Vexu Vexu added this to the 0.15.0 milestone May 20, 2024
Vexu added a commit to Vexu/zig that referenced this issue May 20, 2024
andrewrk pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 20, 2024
@andrewrk andrewrk modified the milestones: 0.15.0, 0.13.0 May 20, 2024
@andrewrk andrewrk removed the standard library This issue involves writing Zig code for the standard library. label May 20, 2024
@andrewrk andrewrk modified the milestones: 0.14.0, 0.13.0 May 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Solving this issue will likely involve adding new logic or components to the codebase.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants