Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add support for qualifiers in test bean overriding and consider improving by-type matching #32822

Closed
simonbasle opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

Add support for qualifiers in test bean overriding and consider improving by-type matching #32822

simonbasle opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@simonbasle
Labels
in: test Issues in the test module type: enhancement A general enhancement
Milestone
6.2.0-M3

Comments

@simonbasle
Copy link
Contributor

simonbasle commented May 14, 2024 •
edited

  • Introduce the option of also using qualifiers, a bit like what is done in Boot's @MockBean
  • Consider supporting some light disambiguation when matching by type in case multiple unqualified beans do match (e.g. primary candidates, fallback candidates...)
@simonbasle simonbasle added in: test Issues in the test module type: enhancement A general enhancement labels May 14, 2024
@simonbasle simonbasle added this to the 6.2.x milestone May 14, 2024
@simonbasle simonbasle self-assigned this May 14, 2024
@simonbasle simonbasle mentioned this issue May 14, 2024
Closed
@snicoll snicoll changed the title Add support for qualifiers in bean overriding and consider improving by-type matching Add support for qualifiers in test bean overriding and consider improving by-type matching May 15, 2024
@simonbasle simonbasle modified the milestones: 6.2.x, 6.2.0-M3 May 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@simonbasle simonbasle

Labels
in: test Issues in the test module type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
6.2.0-M3
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@simonbasle