Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Classical Compound Assigment Operators insufficiently documented #478

Open
jwoehr opened this issue Aug 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Classical Compound Assigment Operators insufficiently documented #478

jwoehr opened this issue Aug 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
clarify specification Change text of spec, not (mainly) semantics of spec

Comments

@jwoehr
Copy link
Collaborator

jwoehr commented Aug 29, 2023

What is the file name(s) where you found the bug?

No response

What is the current text that needs to be fixed or removed? (You can copy and paste)

No response

What should the documentation say instead?

I'm not sure what these Classical Compound Assigment Operators actually do!

Are there other related issues or pull requests about this bug?

No response

Which files need to be updated?

https://openqasm.com/language/classical.html

What content needs to be updated or replaced? (You can copy and paste)

No documentation for ~= and other operators insufficiently documented

What new content needs to be added?

Make sure there is explanation for what each Classical Compound Assigment Operator does

@jlapeyre jlapeyre added the clarify specification Change text of spec, not (mainly) semantics of spec label Jan 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clarify specification Change text of spec, not (mainly) semantics of spec
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants