Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is custom simulation space broken? #293

Open
MaxMaletin opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Is custom simulation space broken? #293

MaxMaletin opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@MaxMaletin
Copy link

I am updating from 3.3.9, and since then the behaviour of custom simulation space seems to have changed. I've got a particle effect inside a scroll rect with simulation space set to custom. When I move the scrollrect, I expect particles to just move with it, preserving their shape, but instead they move up and down way too far. It looks like this is a bug, or maybe custom simulation space is not supported in the current version?

Expected behaviour: particles keep moving up and down in this sin curve like pattern when I scroll

image

Observed behaviour: particles move all over the screen.

image

Also, scene preview breaks

image

I have modified the included demo scene to show this behaviour. To reproduce, open the scene and scroll up and down.

CustomSimulationSpaceBehaviourExample.zip

@mob-sakai mob-sakai self-assigned this Feb 1, 2024
@mob-sakai
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for your reporting!

@mob-sakai mob-sakai added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 2, 2024
@mob-sakai
Copy link
Owner

Unfortunately, it is currently (4.6.3) not working correctly in custom simulation space.

@mob-sakai mob-sakai added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label May 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants